- #1
- 1,031
- 19
Even if you accept AGW hook, line, and sinker, you still have to accept that there are other inputs to global temperatures. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080523.html" [Broken]
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if you accept AGW hook, line, and sinker, you still have to accept that there are other inputs to global temperatures. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080523.html" [Broken]
To point out that even if you accept AGW hook, line, and sinker, you still have to accept that there are other inputs to global temperatures.Jimmy, what is the point of this thread? It seems pretty obscure to me.
That's like saying:To point out that even if you accept AGW hook, line, and sinker, you still have to accept that there are other inputs to global temperatures.
No, its like saying that there are more inputs to GW than just A.That's like saying:
Even if you accept that people die by jumping off tall buildings (hook, line and sinker) you still have to accept that people die of hypothermia. Penguins die too.
I think it should be moved to GD in any case.Unless members intend to discuss the climate change on Jupiter, this thread will be closed or, at best, moved to GD.
Which is about as well understood as the observation that there are more ways of dying than just jumping off buildings.No, its like saying that there are more inputs to GW than just A.
Marcus says the demise of still more spots over the next seven years will mark the end of a newly proposed, 70-year climate cycle.
Another factor is that Jupiter generates much of its heat from within
I think Pluto is being understood rather better than expected, given that we know very little from close range observation. Hopefully, that will change with the New Horizons mission expected to make Pluto-fall in 2015. Following analysis of data from the occultation in 2006, we know that the densification of Pluto's atmosphere has peaked and is now beginning a reversal, about 18 years after its perigee. There has been no measurable increase in density between the 2002 and the 2006 occultations. The delay from perigee of the peak in atmospheric density and temperature, is well-modeled by the thermal inertia of Pluto's highly dense atmosphere.There are various reasons being looked at for causes of the warming.
For Pluto and Triton - http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html