Unparticle physics is currently a very popular research area

Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,590
Reaction score
7,177
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0703260
Unparticle physics is currently a very popular research area. (The initial paper above published in Phys. Rev. Lett. is cited more than 100 times in less than a year.) Thus, it would be nice to have an unparticle thread on this forum as well.

For my contribution to this topic, in which I attempt to answer the question "What the hell unparticle really is?", see:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0801.4471
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ha, you jumped into the herd as well. I was tempted to write up a paper on them right after Georgi published b/c I knew a little about them already from recent research in conformal sectors.

Fun topic, if highly implausible. Already people have analyzed systems with dualities and they don't find any unparticle like spectrums at all, so its probably rarefied at some level..
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top