Let [itex]f[/itex] be a Riemann integrable function defined on an interval [itex][a,b][/itex], and let [itex]P = \{a = x_0 < x_1 < \ldots < x_n = b\}[/itex] be a partition of [itex][a,b][/itex]. I don't understand why the definition of (say) the upper Riemann sum of [itex]f[/itex] associated with [itex]P[/itex] is always given as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

U(f,P) = \sum_{i=1}^n M_i (x_i - x_{i-1}),

[/tex]

where

[tex]

M_i = \sup\limits_{x\in [x_{i-1},x_i]} f(x).

[/tex]

Why does it need to be [itex]\sup[/itex]? Why can't it just be [itex]\max[/itex]? I can't think of an instance where [itex]\max[/itex] wouldn't be suitable; that is, I can't think of a Riemann integrable function that doesn't actuallyattainits max somewhere on any given [itex][x_{i-1},x_i][/itex]. Can someone provide an example for me?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Upper and lower Riemann sums

Loading...

Similar Threads for Upper lower Riemann | Date |
---|---|

I Upper and lower bounds of integral | Sep 8, 2016 |

Upper and Lower Sums | Nov 4, 2013 |

Upper and Lower Limits | Jul 13, 2013 |

Regarding Upper and lower integral sets. | Aug 15, 2012 |

Limits Of Upper And Lower Sums | Jun 20, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**