1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Upper Bound of a Summation

  1. Oct 18, 2016 #1
    There is this summation, that I've been trying to solve, but am not able to do so. It is :
    $$\sum\limits_{i=k}^{n} \frac {1}{(n-i)! m^{i-1}}$$
    I would be happy to find it's upper bound too. So what I did was intensely naive. I made the denominator the minimum by making ##(n-i)! = 1## and ##m^{i-1} = m^{k-1}## (As that would give an upper bound too, but rather a loose one). That, as expected, didn't suffice my needs. Any ideas about how to solve this one?
    Moon.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 19, 2016 #2
    If you rewrite the summation in terms of ##\lambda \equiv (n-i)##, you get a partial sum of the exponential series:
    [tex]\left(\frac{1}{m^{n-1}}\right)\,\sum_{\lambda = 0}^{n-k} \frac{m^{\lambda}}{\lambda!}[/tex],
    which well can be bounded by the exponential or written in terms of the incomplete gamma function.
     
  4. Oct 19, 2016 #3
    Thanks ! :)
     
  5. Oct 19, 2016 #4
    Sorry, but I'm facing a problem again. I found about incomplete gamma functions on wikipedia:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incomplete_gamma_function

    And I found that the upper incomplete gamma function, and the limiting function( defined as ##\gamma *##) suffice my needs. As it's given that :
    $$\gamma * (s,z) = e^{-z} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac {z^{k}}{\Gamma (s+k+1)} $$
    which is equivalent to:
    $$\gamma *(s,z) = e^{-z} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac {z^{k}}{(s+k)!} $$
    When we put ##s=0## then we get :
    $$\gamma *(0,z) = e^{-z} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac {z^{k}}{ k!} $$
    thus in order to find this summation, we need to find :
    $$\ {\gamma *(0,z)} {e^{z}} $$
    So, basically we've to find ##\gamma *(0,z)## .
    There is this Hargot's Theorem given in the wikipedia's page which says :
    $$ \gamma (s,z) = z^{s} \Gamma (s) \gamma *(s,z) $$
    Thus,
    $$\gamma *(s,z) =\frac { \gamma(s,z)} {z^{s} \Gamma(s) } $$
    since ##s=0##, therefore :
    $$\gamma *(0,z) = \frac{\gamma(0,z)} {1* \Gamma(0)} $$
    But, according to this link :
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particular_values_of_the_Gamma_function
    Gamma function is not defined for non-positive integers.
    So, how do I tackle this ##\Gamma(0)## ?
    Moon.
     
  6. Oct 19, 2016 #5

    Svein

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Quoate from Ahlfors: Γ(z) is a meromorphic function with poles at z = 0, -1, -2, ... but without zeros.
     
  7. Oct 19, 2016 #6

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Huh?
    $$\gamma *(0,z) = e^{-z} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac {z^{k}}{ k!} = e^{-z} e^z = 1$$
    Done?
     
  8. Oct 19, 2016 #7
    Sorry, forgot about the expansion of the majestic ##e^{x}## itself.
    Moon.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Upper Bound of a Summation
  1. Bounds of summation (Replies: 2)

  2. Bound for summation (Replies: 1)

Loading...