Urysohn's lemma

  1. 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Urysohn's lemma

    My book says that the "if" part of Urysohn's lemma is obvious with no explanation. Can someone explain why?



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. HallsofIvy

    HallsofIvy 40,551
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    It would have been a good idea to actually state Urysohn's lemma as it is given in your book. Sometimes statements vary from one book to another. In particular you should note that Urysohn's lemma only applies in NORMAL spaces. What is the definition of a "Normal" topological space?
     
  4. Sorry. I meant to put a link to Wikipedia, which has the same statement of Urysohn's Lemma as that in my book.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urysohns_lemma

    It comes down to whether the sets [0,1/2) and (1/2,1] are open. Apparently this is obvious to other people, but it seems counterintuitive to me because I thought open sets were open intervals.
     
  5. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [0, 1/2) is not an open subset of R
    [0, 1/2) is an open subset of [0, 1].
     
  6. I guess that makes sense, since balls around around 0 can have no negative numbers in them, so they are really just half-balls.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar discussions for: Urysohn's lemma
Loading...