Use of Eötvös rule

  • Thread starter wishgames
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0
I am attempting to use Eötvös rule
b492df588ae8d37ba6020019ac203ca7.png
to find the surface tension of water but am not obtaining normal results.

Surface Tension= 2.7*10^(-7)(374-x)*18^(-2/3)
at T=0 Celsius Surface tension = .0114 mN/m with this equation far from the normal 75.7 mN/m
what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
5,439
9
Scientists normally measure temperature in degrees Kelvin not degrees Celsius
 
Last edited:
  • #3
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
25,754
5,175
Scientists normally measure temperature in degrees Kelvin not degrees Celcius

. . . . . because the Zero, used in all other scales is quite arbitrary. It can be based on the fixed freezing point of water, alcohol or anything else. 0K, otoh, is Absolute.
Everybody, I'm sure, has made the mistake at least once in their lives of using °C when they should have used K and arrived at a crazy answer. :wink: You are in good company.
 
  • #4
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
26,808
10,464
Since it's Tc-T, it will work in either Celsius or Kelvin. However, you have to make sure that either both are Celsius or both are Kelvin. You can't mix and match.
 
  • #5
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
36,015
6,695
I think the error is in deriving V from molar mass and density. You should get 18.10-6 m3/mol. The 10-6 seems to have been lost.
 
  • #6
2
0
I'm doing the calculations in Celsius since the critical temperature is in Celsius. Thank you haruspex. Measuring the V in m3/mol made the result 114 mN/m which is closer to the actual surface tension but still off.
 
  • #7
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
36,015
6,695
I'm doing the calculations in Celsius since the critical temperature is in Celsius. Thank you haruspex. Measuring the V in m3/mol made the result 114 mN/m which is closer to the actual surface tension but still off.
Yes, I also get 114 (after correcting the typo in the OP; you had 2.7 instead of 2.1). In the wikipedia entry it mentions subtracting another 6 degrees, but that doesn't help much. Curiously, that leaves the value almost exactly 3/2 times too high.
 

Related Threads on Use of Eötvös rule

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
700
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
34K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
Top