Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Using cramer's Rule to solve for x2, i'm confused on this example!

  1. Oct 23, 2005 #1
    I scanned the page out of the book, alittle bit is kinda burly but i'm confused on how they got A_2(B), where we are thinking of the system in matrix form AX = B. One verfies that detA = -127 and det[A_2(B)] = 313, so
    x2 = det[A_2(B)]/det(A) = 313/-127 = -313/127;

    How did they get B? and det[A_2(B)] here is the picture:
    http://img416.imageshack.us/img416/9428/lastscan5eu.jpg [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 23, 2005 #2
    nevermind i found the pattern, all they do is replace the 2nd column with the values after the =.
  4. Oct 23, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Correct, to find the 'n-th' unknown with Cramer's rule, you have to replace the n-th column by the column of the constants.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook