Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Lounge
General Discussion
Using the surrounding airflow to deduce the physics around UAP/UFO
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Baluncore, post: 6817868, member: 447632"] If there is insufficient evidence, then the UAP/UFO does not represent a threat, and needs no further investigation. The main source of UAP/UFOs is from people who focus intentionally on "insufficient data", noise that would normally have been eliminated in the first review of the data used to classify observed events. It seems counterintuitive, but with an increase in camera numbers, the number of UAP/UFO detections or sightings should fall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
The Lounge
General Discussion
Using the surrounding airflow to deduce the physics around UAP/UFO
Back
Top