Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

V =0, I=0 , OC or SC?

  1. Oct 27, 2012 #1
    When Voltage across two points is 0 & current flowing through that connection is 0. Is it a short circuit or open circuit?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 27, 2012 #2
    Short circuit means there is zero impedance (resistance) between the two points.
    This may lead to zero voltage and no current or a lot of current.

    Open circuit means that there is infinite impedance between the two points.
    Current flow is always zero but the voltage is indeterminate and may be any value including zero

    The condition v=0, I=0 can be either so it is impossible to determine which without knowledge of the connecting impedance.
     
  4. Oct 29, 2012 #3
    'When Voltage across two points is 0 & current flowing through that connection is 0'
    That means I have an amp meter, and a volt meter. I measure the voltage between two points, and the voltage is zero. I then take my amp meter and measure the current that flows through both those nodes, and that current is zero.

    That means your circuit is off buddy, you could just as well have a wire lying on the table, not connected to anything and measure that. You could measure V=0 and I=0 off a glass cup.
    :P

    If you are talking about circuit theory:
    then V=0 is a short circuit AND there can be current flowing through it
    I=0 is an open circuit AND there can be a voltage across the two non-connected wires.
    But those ONLY count when your circuit is ON in some way.

    What are you trying to do? Are you trying to calculate resistance of a circuit, or using super position?
     
  5. Oct 29, 2012 #4

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If R=V/I and both V and I are zero then you get
    R = 0/0
    which is indeterminate. You need to specify either V or I.
     
  6. Oct 29, 2012 #5
    swayam007,

    A short or open is determined by physical contact, not by what voltage is across, current through, or resistance between the contacts. So if the contacts physically touch each other, then you have a short circuit across the contacts.

    Ratch
     
  7. Oct 30, 2012 #6

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    True but, if all you know is that measurements gave you V=0 and I=0, you cannot determine anything about the resistance - infinite / zero / 347Ω.
     
  8. Oct 30, 2012 #7
    sophiecentaur,

    If you are able to insert an ammeter between the contacts, then you should be able to determine whether they are touching or not, and thereby know whether they are open or closed. The quality of the contacts, such as whether they are dirty or corroded does not mean they are open or shorted. Only a physical inspection can determine that for certain. The resistance of the contacts are a a good indication, but not a certainity of their status.

    Ratch
     
  9. Oct 30, 2012 #8

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    According to the title of the thread, your Ammeter reads zero and your voltmeter reads zero. If the only info you have is those readings, then you can tell nothing. You are going for a very practical way of finding out the condition of one particular pair of contacts. Fair enough but unless you have some way of finding current and volts, you can't be sure.
     
  10. Oct 30, 2012 #9
    sophiecentaur

    Well, assuming a perfect ammeter and voltmeter, the ammeter is going to short out the switch so the voltmeter will always read zero whether the switch is open or closed. So, knowing the current and voltage is no sure way to determine the switch status. For me, physical inspection is the definitive determination.

    Ratch
     
  11. Oct 30, 2012 #10

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    But who, in their right mind, would ever connect an Ammeter in PARALLEL???
     
  12. Oct 30, 2012 #11
    sophiecentaur,

     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2012
  13. Oct 30, 2012 #12

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

     
  14. Oct 30, 2012 #13
    sophiecentaur,

    Nope, I make no assumptions about whether the switch is connected to a circuit or stands alone. All I am saying is that you cannot definitively determine whether the switch is open or closed by just examining the voltage across it or the current through it. A physical examination of the contacts is required to definitively determine whether the switch is open or closed.

    Ratch
     
  15. Oct 31, 2012 #14
    actually It is about a Galvanometer in a balanced wheatstone bridge . Current passing through it & Voltage across it is zero. Is it open circuit or short circuit?
     
  16. Oct 31, 2012 #15

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    So all those 'black box' exercises we did at School and all the measurements done, daily, on components are a waste of time? We have to see what it actually looks like before we can tell the impedance of a circuit element.

    Interestingly, it turns out that the scenario was, as I suspected, the situation in a bridge circuit.
     
  17. Oct 31, 2012 #16
    It is neither open circuit nor short circuit.

    I have already outlined the conditions for both and your circuit meets neither.

    Note the conditions do not depend on voltage or current.
     
  18. Oct 31, 2012 #17
    sophiecentaur,

    The exercises were theoretical problems. The measurements were determining highly probable conditions. The observation of the contacts are the definitive status.

    You can determine the impedance from the theoretical position of the switch, or what you think it is.

    Ratch
     
  19. Oct 31, 2012 #18

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'm not sure of your point here. There are many examples of systems into which we cannot look. Opening them up could even destroy them or alter their state. A philosophy of measurement surely can't be based on what we infer from the outward appearance of a component.
    The point was made in a very early post that 0/0 is indeterminate and that's really an end to it. You need to have at least a finite value for one or the other in order to infer anything about the resistance of a component. 'Visual' observation is just not reliable.
     
  20. Oct 31, 2012 #19
    sophiecentaur,

    Just what I said before. You cannot be sure of the status of a switch just by knowing the current existing through it or the voltage across it. I hope the last sentence was clear and concise.

    True that is, but lack of accessibility does not change the uncertainty.

    The philosophy would have to include a caveat stating that the status of the switch cannot be determined with complete confidence from the current/voltage measurement previously mentioned.

    And my point was that any value of current/voltage other than 0/0 still has a degree of uncertainty.

    An inference is not the same as knowing for sure.

    Visual inspection of the contacts is 100% reliable. It is not always available or practical.

    Ratch
     
  21. Oct 31, 2012 #20

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Surely it is obvious that you need to know both current and PD in order to measure the resistance. Resistance is actually defined in terms of the two variables taken together.
    You can know nothing, "for sure". One can only infer, from appropriate measurements.
    Your visual inspection issue is a total red herring. It is not part of the Set of 'electrical measurements'. Visual inspection of contacts is not sufficient at all. They could be made of a shiny insulator, for all you could know. (And, in any case, the OP did not introduce the state of a switch into the argument). You would need extra chemical analysis, at least. On the other hand, an electrical measurement of V and I would tell you how your test subject will behave 'electrically', which is what we want to know (because we are seeking to find the resistance).
    You are welcome to have the final word on this as I'm not sure whether you are 1. Disagreeing with any or all of the above or 2. Agreeing ditto.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook