(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); v=0 in E&F/Kerr coordinates

Edit: I've realised the thread title is a bit misleading. The title suggests that v divided by u equals zero when in fact it's about the point where the ingoing and outgoing coordinates, v and u, become zero independently.

_______________________________________________

Unless I've got something wrong, for static black holes, the ingoing null coordinates, [itex]v=t+r^\star[/itex], are v=∞ at large radii, -∞ at r_{s}, increasing back to zero inside the EH and becoming positive again before reducing back to zero at r=0

For non-static black holes, v=∞ at large radii, -∞ at r_{+}, ∞ at r_{-}and is finite at r=0; the opposite applies for outgoing null coordinates, [itex]u=t-r^\star[/itex] (i.e. u=-∞ at large radii, ∞ at r_{+}, etc.).

As v moves from ∞ to -∞ and back again, there are points where v=0, for static black holes this is at ~2.218M and ~1.594M. This changes as spin is introduced, for a spin of a/M=0.95, v=0 occurs at ~1.934M and ~0.906M (in the case of u, for a spin of 0.95, u=0 occurs at ~3.859M and ~0.834M).

Is there a significance to these radii or is it just a coordinate issue? v=0 appears to be referred to as R_{0}in this paper- http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/sg452/black.pdf [Broken] pages 8 and 9.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# V/u=0 in E&F/Kerr coordinates

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**