- #1

- 1,170

- 3

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Why can't electrons move inside the valence band? Is that the Pauli exclusion principle - and is it true that the electrons cant move even when the valence band is only partially filled?

- Thread starter aaaa202
- Start date

- #1

- 1,170

- 3

Why can't electrons move inside the valence band? Is that the Pauli exclusion principle - and is it true that the electrons cant move even when the valence band is only partially filled?

- #2

- 35,646

- 4,418

Yes.Why can't electrons move inside the valence band? Is that the Pauli exclusion principle

No, it is not true. When it is partially filled, then you have vacancies. These vacancies can move. We call them "holes". We simplify the treatment and description of the valence band by "renormalizing" the background electron charges and consider these holes to be positively-charged particles, and the move upon application of a field.- and is it true that the electrons cant move even when the valence band is only partially filled?

That's why you have p-doped semiconductors. These are semiconductors which holes as the majority charge carrier. These holes reside in the valence band.

Zz.

- #3

- 1,170

- 3

But I must admit that there is one thing I really don't understand about all this. We are using the eigenstates to determine which states an electron can occupy. But this is quantum mechanics! Superposition of eigenstates are possible state to leading to almost infinite combinations of possible states. Why are these not relevant for solid state theory? I think I am misunderstanding something completely.

- #4

DrDu

Science Advisor

- 6,032

- 759

- #5

DrDu

Science Advisor

- 6,032

- 759

You have to distinguish between eigenstates of a one particle hamiltonian and eigenstates of a many particle hamiltonian. If you consider but a single electron, all these superpositions of Bloch states are relevant. However in solid state theory, we are interested in systems containing many electrons.

But I must admit that there is one thing I really don't understand about all this. We are using the eigenstates to determine which states an electron can occupy. But this is quantum mechanics! Superposition of eigenstates are possible state to leading to almost infinite combinations of possible states. Why are these not relevant for solid state theory? I think I am misunderstanding something completely.

There we use the Bloch one electron states only to build up a convenient basis for the many particle hamiltonian, e.g. via antisymmetrized Slater determinants.

- #6

- 1,170

- 3

How does this symmetry arise? Why most the electrons move so as to cancel out any net current?

The problem is not that I don't know how to distinguish between them. The problem is the whole statistical approach where it only seems that the eigenstates are relevant for the statistics when in reality there exists an infinite amount of superpositions of eigenstates for the many particle Hamiltonian, which the many-particle system could be in. https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=715106You have to distinguish between eigenstates of a one particle hamiltonian and eigenstates of a many particle hamiltonian. If you consider but a single electron, all these superpositions of Bloch states are relevant. However in solid state theory, we are interested in systems containing many electrons.

There we use the Bloch one electron states only to build up a convenient basis for the many particle hamiltonian, e.g. via antisymmetrized Slater determinants.

I have tried to adress the problem here but so far the answers have not been very convincing.

- #7

DrDu

Science Advisor

- 6,032

- 759

If you look at Bloch functions, ##\exp(iqx) u_q(x)##, the cell periodic part ##u_q## is a solution of a Schroedinger equation with ##H=(p+q)^2 +V(x)##. If you apply an electric field E it can be included via a vector potential ##A=iEt## (don't ask me about signs and prefactors), so the effect of the field is just that of a q with a linear time dependence.How does this symmetry arise? Why most the electrons move so as to cancel out any net current?

Hence all the ## u_q## will wander parallel to each other through the Brillouin zone. This motion is periodic as ##u_(q+K)=u_q##. In a full band, the states for every possible q is filled and this won't change all states change q at equal path.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 10K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 909