Validation of a Work/Energy Problem

  • Thread starter Mattchu
  • Start date
The surface. (Think of the normal force as the component of the force of gravity that is orthogonal to the surface.) Is the surface horizontal? No! It's inclined. Then the normal force is, by definition, perpendicular to the surface. That's why it's mg cosθ instead of mg sinθ. (Note that cosθ = X/D, which is pretty cool!)In summary, the problem asks for the speed of a box released from rest at Point A, sliding down a frictionless slide to Point B, and then sliding to Point C with friction. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the horizontal surface from Point B to C is [mu] sub k, and the
  • #1
Mattchu
4
0
Hi, this is my first post here. I was just wondering if anyone could validate my work done on this problem. (I have a feeling I missed something)

Here is the problem: A box of mass m is released from rest at Point A, the top of a long, frictionless slide. Point A is at height H above the level of Points B and C. Although the slide is frictionless, the horizontal surface from Point B to C is not. The coeffiecent of kinetic friction between the box and this surface is [mu] sub k, and the horizontal distance between Points B and C is x.

A) Find the speed of the box when its height above Point B is 1/2H .

B) Find the speed of the box when it reaches Point B.

[Edit in:]
C) Determine the value of [mu]k so that the box comes to rest at Point C.
[/Edit]

D) Now assume that Points B and C were not on the same horizontal level. In particular, assume that the surface from B to C had a uniform upward slope so that Point C was still at a horizontal distance of x from B but not at a vertical height of y above B. Answer the question posed in part (c).

E) If the slide were not frictionless, determine the work done by friction as the box moved from Point A to Point B if the speed of the box as it reached Point B was half the speed calculated in part (b).

My answers in variable form (I'm guessing that's how my teacher wanted them answered):

A) PE sub a + KE sub a + W = PE sub b + KE sub b
mg1/2h sub a = 1/2mv^2
[squ] = square root, not check
[squ] 2(g1/2h sub a) = v

B) gh sub a = 1/2v^2
[squ]2(gh sub a) = v

I'll just post my answer for the last two here because posting all of the work in order would take too long...

C) [mu] sub k = -(v sub c ^2 - v sub b^2 / N)

D) [mu] sub k = -(gh + 1/2v sub c ^2 - 1/2v sub b^2 / N)


[Edit in:]
E) fk = -(mvb^2 / 4mgha)
[/Edit]


I believe my problem is I'm not counting the force w sin [the] in the conservation of energy stuff but I'm not sure.


I'd appreciate any help. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can use the [ sub ] and [ /sub ] tags to create subscript.

Part B:

You need to account for the work done by friction as the box is sliding from B to C.

Part C:

You need to include not only the extra energy to raise the box, but also the extra friction from the increased normal force (if any)

Part D:

You should ignore part C for this answer. It's effectively asking how much energy would be lost if the speed was halved.
 
  • #3
Part B: The slide from Points A to B was frictionless, though.

Part C: When you say energy to raise the box, you mean energy of potential? If so, I do have that in the equation (gh). I eliminated m from both sides.

Part D: Actually I did ignore part C, but I ended up with similar looking answers.
 
  • #4
I found your original statement of the problem somewhat puzzling, since you mention a horizontal surface from B to C, but then it never comes up.
Originally posted by Mattchu
Part B: The slide from Points A to B was frictionless, though.
You solved that fine; VB= √(2gH)

Part C: When you say energy to raise the box, you mean energy of potential? If so, I do have that in the equation (gh). I eliminated m from both sides.
I do not understand the problem. Can you restate what is being asked for?
Part D: Actually I did ignore part C, but I ended up with similar looking answers.
Reread NateTG's response. (Point C is not involved.)
 
  • #5
Thanks for bringing that up, Doc Al, because I reread my questions and answers and found that I had not posted question c or answer e. Now they should all be in the right places. Hopefully this clarifies any confusion you had with the problem.

I edited my first post if you want to take a look at it again.
 
  • #6
Now that's better.

C) Here's how I'd do it. All the kinetic energy at B gets dissipated as work done by friction:
KEB = FfrictionX
mgH = μmgX
μ = H/X

D)I assume you meant to say that the position of point C is X (horizontal) and Y (vertical) from point B? In this case, the final energy at C = mgy (potential); the distance along which the friction acts is D = √(X2 + Y2); and the normal force is mg cosθ = mg(X/D). Thus:

mgH-mgY= μmg(X/D)D = μmgX
μ = (H-Y)/X (interesting, eh?)

E) if the speed is cut in half, what happens to the KE at the bottom compared to the no friction case? That loss in KE equals the work done by friction.
 
  • #7
Two things I don't understand from your post: why did you substitute mgH for the value of KEb in question c? I assume you meant 1/2mvb^2.

Also, on question d, why did you put the force as mg cos [the]? Isn't it mg sin [the] when something is moving up an inclined plane?
 
  • #8
Originally posted by Mattchu
Two things I don't understand from your post: why did you substitute mgH for the value of KEb in question c? I assume you meant 1/2mvb^2.
I substituted mgH because that's what the KE equals! You have to solve the problem in terms of what is given, which is the height H. (Leaving KE = 1/2mvb^2 is true by definition, but does not solve the problem. It's kind of lazy! )
Also, on question d, why did you put the force as mg cos [the]? Isn't it mg sin [the] when something is moving up an inclined plane?
What is needed is the normal force, which is perpendicular to the plane.
 

What is the purpose of validating a work/energy problem?

The purpose of validating a work/energy problem is to ensure that the problem is set up correctly and the solution is accurate. It helps to identify any errors or mistakes in the problem-solving process and ensures that the final answer is reliable.

How do you validate a work/energy problem?

To validate a work/energy problem, you can follow these steps:

  • Check if all the given information is relevant and accurate.
  • Verify if the units of measurement are consistent throughout the problem.
  • Apply the correct formulas and equations to solve the problem.
  • Double-check your calculations and make sure they are done accurately.
  • Compare your answer with the expected solution and see if they match.

What are some common mistakes to look out for when validating a work/energy problem?

Some common mistakes to look out for when validating a work/energy problem include:

  • Using the wrong formula or equation.
  • Incorrectly applying the formulas or equations.
  • Using the wrong units of measurement.
  • Making calculation errors or typos.
  • Not considering all the given information in the problem.

Why is it important to validate a work/energy problem?

Validating a work/energy problem is important because it ensures the accuracy and reliability of the solution. It also helps to identify any mistakes or errors in the problem-solving process, which can lead to incorrect results. Validation is an essential step in the scientific method and helps to maintain the integrity of the scientific process.

Can a work/energy problem be validated using only one method?

No, a work/energy problem should be validated using multiple methods to ensure its accuracy. This can include using different formulas and equations, checking for unit consistency, and verifying the solution using different approaches. By using multiple validation methods, any errors or mistakes can be identified and corrected, leading to a more reliable solution.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
232
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
841
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
467
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
215
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
791
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
840
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
836
Back
Top