Variable Mass and Steady Leakage: Finding the Velocity of a Cart with Calculus

In summary: At the beginning it has 100 kg of sand, so it has a mass of (100 kg/0.1 kg/s) = 100 kg. After 50 seconds it has 50 kg of sand, so it has a mass of (50 kg/0.2 kg/s) = 25 kg. The cart is accelerating at a rate of (100-t)/(50-t) = 100/(100-0.2) = 2/s.
  • #1
Sagar98
20
0
A cart has a load of 100 kg sand at start and it is pulled by a steady resultant force of 100N starting from rest. A hole in the cart causes steady leakage of 1kg/s. Find velocity v of the cart after 50s of motion.

What I know about this is that, we have to use calculus.
dF =(dM /dT) *(dV/dT)
dM/dT, since the mass varies with time and dV /dT that us the acceleration. I tried my best. Now someone correct my logic if wrong and tell me the concept to do this. Thanks in advance. I've posted this question like 3-4 times and someone deleted it for random reasons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sagar98 said:
A cart has a load of 100 kg sand at start and it is pulled by a steady resultant force of 100N starting from rest. A hole in the cart causes steady leakage of 1kg/s. Find velocity v of the cart after 50s of motion.

What I know about this is that, we have to use calculus.
dF =(dM /dT) *(dV/dT)
dM/dT, since the mass varies with time and dV /dT that us the acceleration. I tried my best. Now someone correct my logic if wrong and tell me the concept to do this. Thanks in advance. I've posted this question like 3-4 times and someone deleted it for random reasons.

It was not deleted for random reasons. Check your PMs -- you will find the text describing your rules violations there.
 
  • #3
They probably deleted it because you didn't follow the rules for posting homework problems https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=686781
Rearrange this equation,
[tex] F = \frac{d(v)(\triangle M)}{dt} [/tex]
for a momentum equation and take the integral of both sides of the equation with respect to time ,
Pay attention to the DeltaMass, then the rest is simple integration.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I got it, It's like this,
t-time taken
v-velocity
a-acceleration
Now,
(100-t)×a=100
That is ma=Force. But 100-t,as in that the mass reduces as the time increases.
=> (100-t)dv/dt =100
=>dv=100/(100-t) dt
Now substitute 100-t as u, so dt =-du.
Therefore
=> v=-100 integral du/u
=> v=-100 ln (u)
=>v=-100 ln(100-t)
=>put limits from 0-50 secs
v=100(ln100-ln50)
=> v=100(ln(2))
v=69.3m/s
 
  • #5
@state of dogma, thanks..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Cant you use average acceleration rate ?
At the beginning its = 100 / 100 = 1 (m/s)/s
After 50 seconds its = 100 / 50 = 2 (m/s)/s

Average acceleration rate (a) = 1.5 (m/s)/s

Velocity after 50 seconds = a * t = 75 m/s

Comments ?
 
  • #7
Sorry, just done it using increments on excel, i got 69.314 m/s
 
  • #8
Yep correct ^ I did it by writing so calculations ain't as accurate.
 
  • #9
Your method is wrong @dean Barry, the First post - The masses is constantly changing with time, so we don't know the velocity or the acceleration at 50s, So mass is a function of time here.
 
  • #10
That's a reasonable bit of numerical work - but aren't you expected to use calculus to solve this problem? The trick is to use the definition of Force (Newton's second Law) as a differential equation.
Let me start you off... $$F=\frac{dp}{dt}: p(t)=m(t)v(t)$$ ... you need an expression for m(t) and the chain-rule. Set it up as an initial value problem.
 
  • #11
Simon Bridge said:
The trick is to use the definition of Force (Newton's second Law) as a differential equation.
Let me start you off... $$F=\frac{dp}{dt}: p(t)=m(t)v(t)$$
I don't think that's going to work. F is constant here, so you can write down Ft = etc., but in that equation m has to include the lost sand, so you have to figure out the momentum that carried away with it.

Sagar98, what mass of sand is in the cart at time t? Assuming this includes the mass of the cart, how fast will it be accelerating at time t?
 
  • #12
dp=Fdt won't work, no; it gets: mv=Ft => gets v=100/(100-t) which gives v(0)=1 which is false.

I was trying to figure out how the person setting up the question expected them to do it.
I had a go using F=m(t). dv/dt and got the same answer as the numerical one above.

Using F=d(mv)/dt + chain rule and equation for m(t) gives me a solvable DE but I didn't take it further.
Normally you can't use it - but normally the mass lost contributes to the force so the force is not a constant.

Checking - hmmm: the solution does not make sense for the problem... thinking about it - it was probably too much to hope that the problem was that well set up.

Maybe go back to F=ma, same advise only the chain rule is no longer needed?
 
  • #13
Mass of the cart is negligible, It's all the mass of sand.
 
  • #14
@Simon Bridge, Refer to my solution , it's correct.
 
  • #15
Sagar98 said:
@Simon Bridge, Refer to my solution , it's correct.
Quite so - I must have overlooked post #4 previously. Well done.
 
  • #16
Yeah - you did it by F=m(t)dv/dt. Sorry I thought you had evaluated it numerically too ... 2am effect.

Technically F=dp/dt ... so what assumption were you making to simplify the calculation?
(Since it was "correct", this was the assumption you were supposed to make.)

$$F=\frac{d}{dt}(mv)\\ \implies 100=(100-t)\frac{dv}{dt} -v\\
\implies v(t)=\frac{c+100t}{100-t}$$

##v(0)=0\implies c=0 \implies v(50)= 100\text{m/s}## ... So which is physically correct?

However, since you got the assignment answer correct, you may prefer to move on ;)

(Note: I messed up with some of my comments prev post.)
 
  • #17
Sagar98 said:
Mass of the cart is negligible, It's all the mass of sand.
... that would make the answer non-physical for times approaching t=100s ;)
How is the equation changed if the mass is not negligible?
 
  • #18
@Simon Bridge, good question, at t=100s,There is No mass and no acceleration on it... So maybe.. It just goes at the velocity that it gained during first 100 seconds
 
  • #19
Simon Bridge said:
Technically F=dp/dt ... so what assumption were you making to simplify the calculation?
(Since it was "correct", this was the assumption you were supposed to make.)

$$F=\frac{d}{dt}(mv)\\ \implies 100=(100-t)\frac{dv}{dt} -v\\
\implies v(t)=\frac{c+100t}{100-t}$$

##v(0)=0\implies c=0 \implies v(50)= 100\text{m/s}## ... So which is physically correct?

@Simon Bridge: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable-mass_system

The whole momentum of the cart and sand system does not change when some sand is spilt out, as the sand has the same velocity as the cart, (the spilt sand goes only outside the cart) but the force does not accelerate the spilt sand.

So the net momentum change from time t to t+Δt is p(t+Δt) - p(t) = [(M(t)-Δm)(v+Δv) + vΔm]-M(t)v=M(t)Δv + ΔmΔv, but the second term is negligible with the limit Δt→0.

So dp/dt=M(t)dv/dt=F for the whole cart-sand system.

If M(t)=Mo-ct, the solution is v-v(0)=F/c ln(Mo/(Mo-ct)). In this problem, it is v=100ln(100/(100-t)). The cart has nonzero mass, so the denominator is never zero. The speed changes up to time tmax=100 s. At t=50 s, the speed is 100 ln(2), the value Sagar98 got.
 
  • #20
Sagar98 said:
I got it, It's like this,
t-time taken
v-velocity
a-acceleration
Now,
(100-t)×a=100
That is ma=Force. But 100-t,as in that the mass reduces as the time increases.
=> (100-t)dv/dt =100
=>dv=100/(100-t) dt
Now substitute 100-t as u, so dt =-du.
Therefore
=> v=-100 integral du/u
=> v=-100 ln (u)
=>v=-100 ln(100-t)
You have to include the integration constant: v=-100 ln(100-t)+C

ehild
 
  • #21
Yeah, but in definite integration with limits you don't put the constant c..
 
  • #22
Sagar98 said:
Yeah, but in definite integration with limits you don't put the constant c..

then you have to write the solution of the differential equation including the initial condition. So v(t) =v(0)-100 ln(100-t)+100ln(100) =v(0)+ ln(100/(100-t))


If the question was "find the mass when v=10 m/s", what would you get with your formula v=-ln(100-t)?

ehild
 

1. What is a Variable Mass Type Question?

A Variable Mass Type Question is a type of question that involves variables or factors that can change the outcome of an experiment or study. It requires the use of statistical analysis and the consideration of multiple variables to accurately answer the question.

2. How is a Variable Mass Type Question different from a regular question?

A regular question typically has a singular answer that is not affected by changing variables. A Variable Mass Type Question, on the other hand, requires the consideration of multiple variables and their potential impact on the outcome.

3. How do scientists approach answering Variable Mass Type Questions?

Scientists approach answering Variable Mass Type Questions by first identifying all the variables involved and determining how they may affect the outcome. They then use statistical analysis and other scientific methods to analyze the data and draw conclusions.

4. What are some examples of Variable Mass Type Questions in scientific research?

Examples of Variable Mass Type Questions in scientific research include studying the effects of different environmental factors on plant growth, analyzing the impact of various medications on a specific disease, or investigating how different diets affect weight loss.

5. Why is it important to consider variables when asking a scientific question?

Considering variables is important when asking a scientific question because it allows for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the topic being studied. By taking into account all possible factors, scientists can make more informed conclusions and better contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their field.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
886
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
30
Views
806
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top