- #1

- 2

- 0

There's another way of writing the quadratic formula...but how do I derive the 2nd formula using the 1st one? I've tried for hours and I can't get it. I would really appreciate any help.

- Thread starter toltol123
- Start date

- #1

- 2

- 0

There's another way of writing the quadratic formula...but how do I derive the 2nd formula using the 1st one? I've tried for hours and I can't get it. I would really appreciate any help.

- #2

krab

Science Advisor

- 896

- 2

[tex](-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac})(-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac})=4ac[/tex]

Take the two different forms, set them equal to each other and simplify. But you have to know that the lower sign of the plus/minus in the one form corresponds to the upper sign in the other form.

- #3

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 132

Alternatively, multiply with 1 in a smart manner:

[tex]\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*1=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*\frac{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}=\frac{b^{2}-(b^{2}-4ac)}{2a(-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}[/tex]

The alternate version is often used if the numerator in the standard version becomes a difference between almost equal numbers.

I.e, we may avoid loss of significant digits by using the alternate version.

[tex]\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*1=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*\frac{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}=\frac{b^{2}-(b^{2}-4ac)}{2a(-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}[/tex]

The alternate version is often used if the numerator in the standard version becomes a difference between almost equal numbers.

I.e, we may avoid loss of significant digits by using the alternate version.

Last edited:

- #4

- 2

- 0

- #5

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 132

Yes, you multiply with 1 in the form of the conjugate of the numerator.toltol123 said:

Thus, the root expression vanishes from the numerator but reappears in the denominator.

I'm not too sure about what you mean by "rationalizing" and "backwards", though..

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 14K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 69

- Views
- 7K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K