A commutative ring is a variety, because its definition consists only of universally quantified identities:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

g+(h+k) = (g+h)+k

g+0=g

(-g) + g = 0

g + h = h + g

g(hk) = (gh)k

g(h+k) = gh+gk

1g = g

gh = hg

where (-g) denotes the additive inverse of g.

Adding a new predicate symbol "(1/...)" defined by

(1/g)g = 1

and adding this identity to the list, a new variety is created, whose members are fields along with the trivial ring.

Why is it so important to exclude the trivial ring in the definition of a field (by the requirement [itex]0\neq1[/itex] or [itex]|G|\ge2[/itex]) even though fields are not varieties? Is there any value to the structure defined above (the smallest variety containing all rings)?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Varieties, rings, fields

Loading...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**