Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Vector definition

  1. Dec 12, 2015 #1
    Why we can not define a vector as a quantity which has magnitude and direction? Why we define the vectors according to behavior of its components in rotated coordinate-frames?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 12, 2015 #2

    Krylov

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Vectors are, by definition, the elements of a vector space. In my opinion, other definitions are corollaries in disguise.
     
  4. Dec 12, 2015 #3

    haushofer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Vectors and tensors in general are mathematically defined independent of coordinate systems. This emphasizes the fact that they are geometrical objects which don't care about your preference for a certain coordinate system. If you regard a vector via its components as an array {a,b,...} which you can assign a length to, it looks like vectors cannot exist without the choice of coordinates.

    From the coordinate-free definition it follows that the components (!) have a certain behaviour under coordinate transformations, like the rotations you mentioned.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Vector definition
  1. Definition of Torque? (Replies: 3)

  2. Definition of accuracy (Replies: 5)

Loading...