Vector Dot/Cross Identity

  • #1
12
0
Hi, I was looking at an EM problem today and realized I wasn't sure why

(kxH)[tex]\dot[/tex]k = 0

I tried writing it out explicitly and got (w 1,2,3 representing directions)

A1(A2*B3-A3*B2) - A2(A1*B3-A3*B1) + A3(A1*B2-A2*B1)

and I can't see why this should equal zero. This is troubling because the whole dot product of a cross product where one of the vectors is repeated seems to be a general result (of course AxA = 0, that is fine). In fact, I realized I have been using it fairly frequently and wasn't sure why it was so. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well wouldn't kxH give a vector that is perpendicular to both k and H? That vector dot product with k wouild give what then?
 
  • #3
damn it, i knew it was something that simple. of course the result of the curl operation will be a vector quantity that is perpendicular to both k and H. Then the dot product of perpendicular vectors is zero. Thanks for kicking me in the head ;D
 

Suggested for: Vector Dot/Cross Identity

Replies
9
Views
302
Replies
5
Views
284
Replies
6
Views
652
Replies
5
Views
880
Replies
9
Views
676
Replies
4
Views
772
Replies
2
Views
306
Replies
4
Views
508
Replies
6
Views
666
Back
Top