- #1
- 533
- 5
You know the example "The space of functions from a set S to a field F" that's usually
given in a linear algebra text? Well they never give an example of the set they're working in
in detail so I defined the set as:
((S, (S x S, S, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (S x F, F, •))
where:
+ : S x S → S defined by + : (f,g) ↦ (f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)
• : S x F → F defined by • : (f,β) ↦ (βf)(x) = βf(x).
&
(S, (S x S, S, +)) is an abelian group of vectors (functions),
((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)) is the field over which the operations take place,
(S x F, F, •) is the operation of scalar multiplication on vectors (functions).
My questions is: How would I illustrate a vector space of matrices akin to the notation
above?
Since a matrix is just the function f : (i,j) ↦ A(i,j) = Aij (as defined in Hoffman/Kunze anyway!).
I think the function is more generally defined as
f : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n
To translate it into the above language I'm thinking:
((Fm x n, (Fm x n x Fm x n, Fm x n, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (Fm x n x F, Fm x n, •))
where
+ : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n defined by + : (i,j) ↦ (A + B)(i,j) = A(i,j) + B(i,j) = Aij + Bij
• : Fm x n x F → Fm x n defined by • : ((i,j),β) ↦ (βA)(i,j) = βA(i,j) = βAij
But that seems weird tbh, is it correct?
given in a linear algebra text? Well they never give an example of the set they're working in
in detail so I defined the set as:
((S, (S x S, S, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (S x F, F, •))
where:
+ : S x S → S defined by + : (f,g) ↦ (f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)
• : S x F → F defined by • : (f,β) ↦ (βf)(x) = βf(x).
&
(S, (S x S, S, +)) is an abelian group of vectors (functions),
((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)) is the field over which the operations take place,
(S x F, F, •) is the operation of scalar multiplication on vectors (functions).
My questions is: How would I illustrate a vector space of matrices akin to the notation
above?
Since a matrix is just the function f : (i,j) ↦ A(i,j) = Aij (as defined in Hoffman/Kunze anyway!).
I think the function is more generally defined as
f : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n
To translate it into the above language I'm thinking:
((Fm x n, (Fm x n x Fm x n, Fm x n, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (Fm x n x F, Fm x n, •))
where
+ : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n defined by + : (i,j) ↦ (A + B)(i,j) = A(i,j) + B(i,j) = Aij + Bij
• : Fm x n x F → Fm x n defined by • : ((i,j),β) ↦ (βA)(i,j) = βA(i,j) = βAij
But that seems weird tbh, is it correct?