Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Veliocity in QM

  1. Jun 26, 2010 #1
    How do we define veliocity of a particle in QM?
    How it's related to the momentum.
    Are there any ways to cimpute quickly mean value of veliocity.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 26, 2010 #2
    one way is still with the same old fashion [tex] \bf{u} [/tex] :)

    however, another way is with the group velocity of a wave

    [tex]v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}[/tex]

    and this way can also be thought of as

    [tex]v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}=\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}[/tex]

    with [tex] E [/tex] and [tex] p [/tex] being the particle's energy and momentum respectively.

    for more information on this go to:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity" [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  4. Jun 27, 2010 #3

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The velocity operator is the momentum operator divided by mass.
     
  5. Jun 27, 2010 #4
    Hi.

    Yes, you may define velocity as this. However in case you think of Zitterbewegung motion, velocity has nothing to do with momentum and its magnitude is c, velocity of light.

    Regards.
     
  6. Jun 27, 2010 #5

    K^2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That is the proper way of defining it. Keep in mind that for any momentum-independent potential:

    [tex]\frac{\partial E}{\partial p} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p} = \frac{p}{m}[/tex]

    Which is the same thing that Demystifier suggested.

    In general, don't forget that Hamiltonian mechanics still works.

    [tex]\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}[/tex]
     
  7. Jun 27, 2010 #6
    Thanks for answers. I'm wonder what's the proper definition in case of magnetic field?
     
  8. Jun 27, 2010 #7

    reilly

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Velocity is just the time derivative of the coordinate vector. If X is the x coordinate, then

    V(X) = dX/dt = -i [X,H], the Heisenberg Equation of motion for the x position coordinate. With a conserved NR system, V=P/m, where P is the momentum operator, and m the mass.

    The Dirac eq. is not so easy for V; H is linear in momentum, so up to constant factors,V = GAMMA x, the Dirac matrix that multiplies Px in the Hamiltonian.

    V/dt=dD/dt is non zero, V does not commute with the free Hamiltonian.

    This shows one of the substantial difference between relativistic and non-relativistic QM; the interaction between spatial coords and spin. Dirac in his book QM, gives a good explanation of velocity for the Dirac E.

    Regards,
    Reilly Atkinson
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Veliocity in QM
  1. Operators in QM (Replies: 5)

  2. Units in QM (Replies: 2)

  3. QM and the continuum (Replies: 25)

  4. QM at the singularity (Replies: 4)

  5. QM and Determinism (Replies: 68)

Loading...