VERY hard integral (atleast to me)

  • Thread starter Techman07
  • Start date
I am trying to integrate from 0 to 8

C (t)e^-rt


and C(t) is equal to 50t^1/2 (50 times the square root of t)


I was thinking I could use an infinite series method, the one in the form of e to the x, and my x would be -rt. But if I decide to go that route, then what would I do with 50t^1/2 ?

What do you all think?
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
Make the sub [itex] u=\sqrt{t} [/itex] and then part integration and use the definition of "erf".

Daniel.
 
788
0
Yes I think part integration is the way to go.

In case you have no idea what erf(x) is, here is a link to read up on.

[tex]erf(x) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^{z}e^{-t^2}dt[/tex]

Jameson
 
Last edited:

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
Your definition is not normalized to unity. We like those kind of definitions, though.

Daniel.
 
788
0
I'm sorry, I don't quite understand how a definition is normalized to unity. Please explain. Is the variables, lack of defining things...?
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
I meant the function. For your "erf" [itex] \lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty} \ erf(x) =\frac{1}{2} [/itex].

Daniel.

P.S.You should have picked the constant as to make the limit "+1".
 
788
0
Apologies then to all. I was just putting my two cents of what I knew in. As usual Daniel, you know much more than myself.
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
It's not compulsory to use a constant before the integral, u can drop it. But we usually have conventions when defining special functions.

We can define

[tex] \tan x=:\sqrt{\pi\sqrt{e\sqrt{\varphi}}} \ \frac{\sin x}{\cos x} [/tex]

,but the convention is to choose the constant =1.

Daniel.
 
788
0
Could you explain why? Why doesn't the constant make a difference?
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
Why would it? You can define the function

[tex] eerf (x) =\int_{0}^{x} \exp\left(-t^{2}\right) \ dt [/tex].

Daniel.
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,927
504
First of all, you need to address it with a diferent name."Tangent" and the shortening "tan" are already used for a function. Then you need to make your function known and accepted. Since it's basically a rescaling of an already existing object, i'm sure everyone will reject it. As i said, it's all a matter of conventions and definitions. It's the majority of mathematicians that decide whether your convention/definition or "X"'s is better and should be accepted.

I think this is running off topic and it shouldn't. If i didn't make my point clear, that's it.

Daniel.
 
788
0
I see your point. I was just confused if you were discussing new functions or ones previously established.

From Mathworld - "Note that some authors (e.g., Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 341) define erf(z) without the leading factor of [itex]\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}[/itex]"

So it seems both definitions are acceptable.
 
466
4
dextercioby said:
First of all, you need to address it with a diferent name."Tangent" and the shortening "tan" are already used for a function. Then you need to make your function known and accepted. Since it's basically a rescaling of an already existing object, i'm sure everyone will reject it. As i said, it's all a matter of conventions and definitions. It's the majority of mathematicians that decide whether your convention/definition or "X"'s is better and should be accepted.
For example, if I had my way, sin(x) would be denoted by $(x), and cos(x) would be denoted by ©(x). :biggrin:
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top