Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Very simple problem, cant get it

  1. Feb 12, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    An astronaut on Jupiter drops a rock straight downward from a height of 1.05 m. If the acceleration of gravity on Jupiter is 24.8 m/s2, what is the speed of the rock just before it lands?

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    At first i attempted to simply multiply 24.8 and 1.05, but realized that was probably wrong. I then calculated t by dividing 1.05 by 24.8 and got t=.042. Then used speed = distance/time to get s=1.05/.042 to get 1.04m/s. Does this sound correct, or is it way off? Would just like to know if this is the right method or if my answer is right. Thx
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 12, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Your approach is wrong. If we divide (1.05m)/(24.8m/s2) we do not get the unit of second, instead we get second2, which isnt right for time. Also I'm not sure why you even want to divide distance by acceleration. You need to use a pair of kinematic equations for this:

    vf = vi * at
    d = vi*t + 1/2*a*t2
    vi - initial velocity
    d - distance

    You first need to find the time it took to fall, then you can find the final velocity (vf).
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2007
  4. Feb 12, 2007 #3
    The problem I am working on corresponds with a problem in a book I have that also has an answer. I used to formula V= Square root of 2*g*x (formula of velocity as a function of position). This V was listed as the answer for the final velocity in the book. Instead, I manipulated the velocity as a function of time formula (v=gt) to t=v/g, to get the time (I got .29s), then put that into the formula Vf=Vi*at. I copied this method for the book problem and got a different answer than the one the book got.

    So... is my formula not correct, or would Vf simply be the square root of 2gx?
  5. Feb 12, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Ah, yes. This was an easier formula to use rather than find time, then find the final velocity.
    Not sure exactly what you did, but the time it took for the object to reach Vf is Vf/g. When you multiply g and t, you must obviously get Vf.
    Yup. You'd get the same answer if you used the two equations I gave you, or use square root of 2*a*d.
  6. Feb 12, 2007 #5
    Yep, that worked fine. Thanks for your help!
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook