Gravitational Collapse of Protostars: When Does Fusion Begin?

In summary, a protostar will begin gravitational collapse if its total gravitational potential energy exceeds twice the thermal energy. As it collapses, about half of the gravitational potential energy is converted into heat and radiated into space. The protostar stops collapsing when its gravitational potential energy is equal to its thermal energy, but half of the lost energy is now in heat so the total thermal energy is twice the original amount. The protostar must collapse until its core is hot and dense enough for nuclear fusion to begin. The virial theorem applies to systems with finite collections of point particles, where the time averages of the total kinetic and potential energy are well-defined and the positions and velocities are bounded for all time. This theorem is used to find the
  • #1
StephenPrivitera
363
0
A protostar will begin gravitational collapse only if the total gravitational potential energy exceeds twice the thermal energy. In other words, a gas has to be sufficiently cool and sufficiently dense to collapse. Also, as the protostar collapses about half of the gravitational PE is converted into heat, and about half is radiated into space. So suppose we have a protostar cloud with a thermal energy of T. If it is to collapse its gravitational PE should be >2T, say 3T. After some time, the protostar loses 2T in gravitational energy so that its gravitational potential energy is T. But half of the lost energy is now in heat, so the total thermal energy is now 2T. Will this protostar stop collapsing? How much must it collape before nuclear fusion begins?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
How much must it collape before nuclear fusion begins?
The easy answer is "until the core is hot and dense enough". Are you looking for something specific, e.g. how hot? how dense? or perhaps "it first begins to burn its deuterium, and destroy what little lithium it has, when [answer goes here]"
 
  • #3
If the motions are not random/isotropic, the virial theorem still applies, but its form changes a bit. Similarly, since our system is made up of many objects, we can gain some insight by seeing how the orbital velocities vary with radius from the center outward.

For example, in a spiral galaxy, the dominant motion of the stars in the disk is circular rotation in the plane of the disk. The variation in the orbital velocities with radius V(r) is called the rotation curve.

-----------

Suppose you have a finite collection of point particles interacting gravitationally via good old Newtonian mechanics. And suppose that:

1. The time averages of the total kinetic energy and the total potential energy are well-defined.
2. The positions and velocities of the particles are bounded for all time.

Then we have:
<T> = -<V>/2

where <T> is the time average of the total kinetic energy, and <V> is the time average of the total potential energy.
I always found this to be a bit magical. It seems surprising at first that such a simple law could hold so generally. But in fact, it's just a special case of something called the "virial theorem", which also applies to forces other than gravity, and impacts everything from astronomy to the theory of gases.

For example, out in space, very often a bunch of particles will collapse to form a gravitationally bound system. If the system is roughly in equilibrium so the time averages of kinetic and potential energy are close to their current values, the virial theorem implies that T = -(1/2) V. we know that <T> = -<V>/2. This is a terrific thing, because it let's you find the masses of bound systems. In fact, it's really the reason we think that dark matter exists.

To be specific, suppose you measure the speeds of a bunch of visible objects in your system, and infer T. Then the virial theorem tells you V. If you find out that the potential well is deeper than what you'd get by adding up the contributions from the masses of everything you see, you know there's dark matter. People do this for spiral galaxies, elliptical galaxies, and galaxy clusters, getting strong evidence for dark matter in all cases, I guess.
 
  • #4
Originally posted by Nereid
or perhaps "it first begins to burn its deuterium, and destroy what little lithium it has, when [answer goes here]"
Yes, I suppose this is exactly what I'm looking for. What measurements imply that nuclear fusion is occurring? Mass? density? Temperature?
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Jeebus
For example, out in space, very often a bunch of particles will collapse to form a gravitationally bound system. If the system is roughly in equilibrium so the time averages of kinetic and potential energy are close to their current values, the virial theorem implies that T = -(1/2) V. we know that <T> = -<V>/2.

Does this mean that a protostar which has the initial property T < V/2 will collapse until it reaches equilibrium at T = V/2? Suppose we know the average temperature, mass and density of a protostar. Can we predict what size star will result from the collapse by finding when T = V/2?
 
  • #6
Originally posted by StephenPrivitera
Yes, I suppose this is exactly what I'm looking for. What measurements imply that nuclear fusion is occurring? Mass? density? Temperature?
Temperature, and the EM spectra (same measurement). Sub-stellar masses radiate heavily in IR and radio, but you won't get x-ray, gamma ray or much UV unless the core temperatures reach ~11 million K to start fusion.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the process of gravitational collapse of protostars?

The gravitational collapse of protostars is the process by which a cloud of gas and dust in space collapses under its own gravity, forming a dense, hot core. As the core continues to collapse, it becomes denser and hotter, eventually reaching temperatures and pressures high enough for nuclear fusion to begin.

2. How long does it take for fusion to begin during gravitational collapse?

The exact timing of when fusion begins during gravitational collapse can vary depending on the mass and composition of the protostar, but typically it takes about 1 million years for fusion to start. This is because it takes time for the core to reach the necessary temperature and pressure for fusion to occur.

3. What factors affect the timing of fusion during gravitational collapse?

The main factors that affect when fusion begins during gravitational collapse are the mass and composition of the protostar. Higher mass protostars have stronger gravitational forces, causing them to collapse faster and reach fusion temperatures more quickly. The composition of the protostar also plays a role, as different elements have different fusion temperatures and therefore can affect the timing of fusion.

4. What happens to a protostar if fusion does not begin?

If fusion does not begin in a protostar, it will continue to collapse until it reaches a state of hydrostatic equilibrium, where the inward force of gravity is balanced by the outward force of gas pressure. At this point, the protostar will become a brown dwarf, a failed star that is too small to sustain fusion.

5. How does the gravitational collapse of protostars contribute to the formation of new stars?

The gravitational collapse of protostars is a crucial step in the formation of new stars. As the protostar collapses, it releases energy in the form of heat and light, which can trigger nearby gas and dust clouds to also begin collapsing. This can lead to the formation of multiple new stars in the same region, creating a star cluster.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
91
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
759
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top