How Does Cable Size Affect Voltage Drop in Three-Phase Systems?

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving a 120V supply with 600 feet of copper cable running to a load and 600 feet of neutral wire coming back to the supply. The speaker is trying to determine the voltage at the load due to voltage drop in the cables with a current of 12A. They use an equation to calculate the voltage drop, taking into account the cable length, current, and other factors. They also consider the effect of balanced and unbalanced three-phase systems and the resistance of the neutral wire. The speaker also mentions another approach using the Ohms/(1000feet) value of the cable.
  • #1
lukas86
70
0
I was just looking for some insight on this problem. It is not a homework problem, my boss just asked me to figure it out.

Now, there is 120V supply, with 600 feet of cable (copper) running to a load, and 600 ft neutral coming back to the supply. Ignoring the resistance of the load, he asked what was the voltage at the load due to the voltage drop in the cables with a current of 12A.

Now, he wanted to know the values for #12 wire, and #8 wire. Below is what I came to...


VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM (equation from... h t t p : / / ecmweb.com/mag/electric_code_calculations_17/)

VD: Voltage drop
k: Direct current constant (12.9 for copper)
Q: Alternating current adjustment factor (skin effect), I thought it doesn't apply here...
I: Current (I think, it said "The load in amperes at 100%, not 125% for motors or continuous loads." I just put the 12A here)
D: Distance in ft
CM: Cable in Circ-Mils

#12 Wire
VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM
= 1.732*12.9 * 12A * 600ft / 6529.8CM
= 24.636V

Now, that is what I thought the voltage drop in the 600ft cable to the load was. Now I am confused because at first I thought that since there is also 600ft of cable back to the source, the voltage across the load would be 70.727V seeing as 120V - 24.636V (cable to load) - 24.636V (cable back to source) = 70.727V across the load.

Then I thought again, well... in 3 phase, if perfectly balanced, there is no current in the neutral lead back to the source. So the voltage across the load would be around 95V.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For #8 Wire
VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM
= 1.732*12.9 * 12A * 600ft / 16509CM
= 9.744V

Now then the same situation as for the #12 wire, if I am doing any of this correctly... should be something like 120V - 9.744V *2 = 100.511V across the load or... 120V - 9.744V = 110.255V.

Any help or requests for further understanding so I could respond to get more help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Code:
AWG       Dia-mils  TPI       Dia-mm    Circ-mils Ohms/Kft  Ft/Ohm    Ft/Lb     Ohms/Lb   Lb/Kft    *Amps     MaxAmps

8         128.49    7.7828    3.2636     16509    0.6282    1591.8    20.011    0.0126    49.973    22.012    33.018
12         80.807    12.375    2.0525    6529.8    1.5883    629.61    50.593    0.0804    19.765    8.7064    13.060
 
  • #3
lukas86 said:
I was just looking for some insight on this problem. It is not a homework problem, my boss just asked me to figure it out.

Now, there is 120V supply, with 600 feet of cable (copper) running to a load, and 600 ft neutral coming back to the supply. Ignoring the resistance of the load, he asked what was the voltage at the load due to the voltage drop in the cables with a current of 12A.

Now, he wanted to know the values for #12 wire, and #8 wire. Below is what I came to...


VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM (equation from... h t t p : / / ecmweb.com/mag/electric_code_calculations_17/)

VD: Voltage drop
k: Direct current constant (12.9 for copper)
Q: Alternating current adjustment factor (skin effect), I thought it doesn't apply here...
I: Current (I think, it said "The load in amperes at 100%, not 125% for motors or continuous loads." I just put the 12A here)
D: Distance in ft
CM: Cable in Circ-Mils

#12 Wire
VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM
= 1.732*12.9 * 12A * 600ft / 6529.8CM
= 24.636V

Now, that is what I thought the voltage drop in the 600ft cable to the load was. Now I am confused because at first I thought that since there is also 600ft of cable back to the source, the voltage across the load would be 70.727V seeing as 120V - 24.636V (cable to load) - 24.636V (cable back to source) = 70.727V across the load.

Then I thought again, well... in 3 phase, if perfectly balanced, there is no current in the neutral lead back to the source. So the voltage across the load would be around 95V.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For #8 Wire
VD = 1.732*k*Q*I*D/CM
= 1.732*12.9 * 12A * 600ft / 16509CM
= 9.744V

Now then the same situation as for the #12 wire, if I am doing any of this correctly... should be something like 120V - 9.744V *2 = 100.511V across the load or... 120V - 9.744V = 110.255V.

Any help or requests for further understanding so I could respond to get more help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

That equation should work just fine.

In a balanced three-phase system the current in the neutral is zero. If it is unbalanced, the current in the neutral will be the phasor sum of the phases. Hence, the total cable drop for any phase would be the algebraic sum of the voltage drop in the hot wire plus the voltage drop in the neutral wire (keeping in mind this is phasor addition).

In a single-phase system you have to include the neutral wire resistance since there is current flowing in it and thus drops some voltage due to its resistance.

CS
 
  • #4
Alright thanks.

If I took a different approach and took the Ohms/(1000feet) value of the cable, and multiplied that by the length (600 ft) then multiply that by the current... would that be another method?

= .6282 ohms/Kft * 600ft
= .37692 ohms

V = IR
= 12A * .37692 ohms
= 4.52304 V...

So that 4.52 V would be the drop over 600 feet of #8 wire. Is this another way, it gives less voltage drop though. It's just that I am not all that clear on these two approaches.
 
  • #5
lukas86 said:
Alright thanks.

If I took a different approach and took the Ohms/(1000feet) value of the cable, and multiplied that by the length (600 ft) then multiply that by the current... would that be another method?

= .6282 ohms/Kft * 600ft
= .37692 ohms

V = IR
= 12A * .37692 ohms
= 4.52304 V...

So that 4.52 V would be the drop over 600 feet of #8 wire. Is this another way, it gives less voltage drop though. It's just that I am not all that clear on these two approaches.

That would give you the single phase voltage drop in a three-phase system. Since you have a balanced 3-phase system, the total drop would be multiplied by [tex] \sqrt{3} [/tex] to account for the phase difference (remember I said you have to perform phasor addition). That is just the equivalent for a balanced 3-phase system.

The approach I gave you the first time and the equation you posted are identical except that the approach I gave you will allow you to calculate an unbalanced load's drop also. Whereas the equation is for a balanced load.

Good luck.

CS
 
  • #6
BTW, I forgot to mention that those equations neglect the reactance in the cable. However, they are of course exact for DC.

If you want the to include the reactance, the approximate voltage drop for AC then use the general equation for line-to-neutral:

[tex]V = IR \cos{\phi} + IX \sin{\phi} [/tex]

Then multiple by 2 for single-phase or [tex] \sqrt{3} [/tex] for three-phase to get the line-to-line drop.

Hope that helps.

CS

EDIT: If you need the exact voltage drop formula, let me know (it's longer to type!).
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Thanks again, in the 2nd part of that eqn. what is the X?
 
  • #8
lukas86 said:
Thanks again, in the 2nd part of that eqn. what is the X?

The line reactance for one conductor (in Ohms).

CS
 
  • #9
This relates to this problem at the mill. There were readings taken from around the mill, on the PDCs and the breakers/equipment relating to each PDC. Now what I was looking for by posting this PDF attachment was anything odd from the readings.

The only thing I really noticed was that in some cases, the equipment had higher readings than the PDC-MAIN voltages. Now the transformer feeds the PDCs, then the PDCs feed the power to the equipment, so I thought the PDCs should have the highest voltages.

Just looking for thoughts though. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • VOLTAGE_READINGS.pdf
    68 KB · Views: 446
  • #10
thanks
 

1. What is voltage drop in a three phase system?

Voltage drop in a three phase system is the amount of voltage lost between the source and the load due to the resistance of the conductors. It is measured in volts and can have a significant impact on the efficiency and performance of electrical systems.

2. What causes voltage drop in a three phase system?

Voltage drop in a three phase system is primarily caused by the resistance of the conductors, which increases as the length of the circuit increases. Other factors such as the type and size of the conductors, the type of load being powered, and the quality of connections can also contribute to voltage drop.

3. How is voltage drop calculated in a three phase system?

Voltage drop in a three phase system can be calculated using Ohm's Law, which states that voltage drop (V) is equal to the current (I) multiplied by the resistance (R). In three phase systems, the voltage drop is typically calculated for each individual phase and then added together to get the total voltage drop.

4. What is an acceptable voltage drop in a three phase system?

There is no universally accepted value for an acceptable voltage drop in a three phase system, as it can vary depending on the specific application. Some common guidelines suggest keeping voltage drop below 3% for general power distribution and 5% for motor loads. It is important to consult with the relevant codes and standards for specific requirements.

5. How can voltage drop in a three phase system be reduced?

There are several ways to reduce voltage drop in a three phase system, including using larger conductors, minimizing the length of the circuit, and improving connections and terminations. Other solutions may include using higher voltage systems, such as 480 volts instead of 240 volts, or implementing power factor correction to reduce the reactive power and improve the efficiency of the system.

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
910
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
32
Views
9K
Back
Top