Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Volume of a parallelepiped's sign

  1. Oct 3, 2004 #1

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I have this problem that reads

    a) Prove that the three-product (A.(B x C)) of the vectors A, B and C where A, B and C are not lying in a single plane, is the volume of the parallelepiped whose edges are A, B and C with positive or negative sign according to wheter a right-hand screw rotated from A toward B would advance along C in the positive or negative direction.

    With some effort, I did that.

    b) Use this result to prove the following identity geometrically: A.(B x C) = (A x B).C. Verify that the right and left members of the identity are equal in sign as well as in magnitude.

    I proved the identity geometrically and then I argued that both members were the same in magnitude because geometrically they both represented by parallelepiped of equal edged and all parallelepiped of equal edges have equal volume, hence...etc.

    But the sign part, I can't find the trick.

    The identity gives |ABCsin(x)cos(y)| = |ABCsin(w)cos(z)| where x is the angle between B and C, y the angle between A and B x C, w the angle between A and B and z the angle between C and A x B.

    All of these angles are between 0 and 180°, which means sin(x) and sin(w) are always positive and the negative sign comes from y and z being between 90° and 180°.

    If I could show that when one angle on the cos is between 90° and 180°, so is the other it would be done, but I can't find a relationship between any of the 4 above angles except that sin(x)|cos(y)| = sin(w)|cos(z)|.


    If you have any idea, let me know. Big thanks!
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 3, 2004 #2

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    If your geometrical intuition fails, you can fall back on proving this relation algebraically.
    (If you do this, it might spur you on to find a correct geometric argument!)
     
  4. Oct 4, 2004 #3
    Is it necessary to use the above result ....
    there is an easier without using the above result ....

    -- AI
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2004
  5. Oct 4, 2004 #4

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Say that again?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Volume of a parallelepiped's sign
  1. Sigma sign (Replies: 10)

  2. Roots, signs and abs (Replies: 8)

Loading...