- #1
FizixFreak
- 154
- 0
has the volume of an electron ever been calculated if yes than what is its value?
So, mathematically, the electron can be seen as a type of singularity, or rupture, that generates a smoothing effect around it called the Uehling correction?Bob S said:The bare electron is believed to be a point particle, but the bare electron is "shielded" by a cloud of virtual electron-positron pairs (vacuum polarization) that reduces the observed charge at large distances (low momentum transfers). This correction was first calculated by Uehling in 1935 (Phys Rev 48 55). The Uehling correction (around an atomic nucleus) is an important contribution to atomic energy levels in pionic and muonic atoms, which penetrate the virtual electron-positron cloud..
Bob S
jnorman said:the electron is a point particle. it has zero volume.
Dr Lots-o'watts said:A volume can be defined for the space where it's probably located. But this depends on its state i.e. you have to specify which electron your are talking about : one that is free, one that is in a field, one that is bounded to an atom, one that is inside a solide etc.
By being empty space brim full of physical interactions between the particles.Delta² said:Noob question: If all the elementary particles are point particles with no volume, then how the macroscopic objects have volume?
Delta² said:Noob question: If all the elementary particles are point particles with no volume, then how the macroscopic objects have volume?
vtakhist said:Now if by point particle - we mean "infinitesimal" rather than volume and spatial extensions are 0, then this seems to address the problem.
Elementary particles are point-objects. Electron may not be elementary, but whatever it is made up of WILL be point-particles.vtakhist said:Electron is said to be a point particle just because all the measurements thus far have not established any particular size. As an approximation this is good.
vtakhist said:Example1: you cannot properly integrate or sum over anything spatially if it has 0 extensions...
vtakhist said:Example2: suppose you have a ball of finite size, now you take the ball to be a point ball with no spatial extensions, then if there is no more spatial extensions there is no more ball - since if there would be a ball it would exist and thus occupy some space - leading to a contradiction in assumption.
FizixFreak said:how do these different situations you describe change the answer to my question?
Delta² said:Noob question: If all the elementary particles are point particles with no volume, then how the macroscopic objects have volume?
In the same way, the volume of an electron could be said to be the volume of space where it has an effect on other particles. For the various systems I mentioned, this volume is different. Just find r where the coulomb force is significant in your system and calculate the volume (if it's spherical, which isn't necessarily that case within periodic matter).
kunalkishore said:if electron is considered as a point sized particle...still it will be of some size in the order of some very very minor unit...(say 10-100! or something like that)
ex:-consider a dot that u make on a paper...this dot will be of some size..when we look it through a microscope...isnt it?
Antiphon said:How about saying it's at least the Planck length cubed? Isn't that the minimum meaningful volume of anything?
FizixFreak said:correct me if i m wrong but mathematically having zero volume would mean that the electron occupies no space even though it has mass.
can anything has zero volume without being massless?