Wave 2d, 3d

  • Thread starter sadhu
  • Start date
  • #1
158
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I am in eleventh standard , In my book it is given about the plane progressive simple harmonic wave , later somewhere is mentioned about
intensity of wave

what my doubt is
intensity is defined as energy/area
but what about waves in 2d or 1d
plane SHW are 1d as wave progresses in x axis

how to about for waves in 2d or 3d
surely their amplitude must follow inverse distance or square law??????
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
G01
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,665
16
Well, if I understand your question correctly, then the answer is yes. For 2-D and 3-D waves, as they spread over farther and farther distances, their amplitudes must decrease because of conservation of energy. In fact, this is why a radio signal gets weaker as you move away from the source of the signal.

Is this what you are asking about?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
158
0
but how to derive expression for the amplitude of such waves (suppose source is point object)
 
  • #4
G01
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,665
16
This may possibly be a homework question, so I can't give you a full derivation, but maybe I can set you off on the right path and you can derive it yourself.

Start with a spherical wave from a point source, which has an intensity [tex]I_o[/tex] at a distance [tex]r_o[/tex] from the source.

Now, remember that: [tex]I=P/A[/tex] where P is power and A is area of the surface the wave is on. Since energy is conserved, power must also be conserved, so we have:

[tex]I_o=P/A_0[/tex] and [tex]I_1=P/A_1[/tex] where I_1 is the intensity at some farther point r_1. Now, can you use these equations and the expressions for the surface areas of the surfaces at r_1 and r_2, to find the ratio of I_1 to I_o? If you can, then how do you relate amplitude to intensity?
 
  • #5
158
0
i =constant * amplitude square
still I dont think one could go that easily
relation between amplitude and intensity is derived in book and other books at my standard using 1 D wave motion , how can we say that that remains true for all dimensions
2,3

i already have thought of something ,but can you tell whether
average energy passing through a point in any wave motion is always half the max. passing through it when its phase=0,2pi etc;
 
  • #6
Claude Bile
Science Advisor
1,471
19
i =constant * amplitude square
still I dont think one could go that easily
relation between amplitude and intensity is derived in book and other books at my standard using 1 D wave motion , how can we say that that remains true for all dimensions
2,3
You can't, you need to make additional assumptions to make the derivation.

For example, the inverse square law assumes a source with spherical wavefronts. You can't apply the inverse square law to laser beams.

Claude.
 
  • #7
158
0
can you please tell the average intensity of a spherical wave with respect to time
i.e when one complete wave pass through that point in time T

one more thing
can,t we suppose spherical wave amplitude as the amplitude of wave passing through the string in which density is directly proportional to distance square.

and
is it that that for a constant power input for a wave at origin in string waves,
energy present in a single particle (infinitely small part of string) is constant through out the string.
 

Related Threads on Wave 2d, 3d

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
33
Views
17K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
806
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Top