1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Wave function

  1. Jun 28, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    attachment.php?attachmentid=36776&stc=1&d=1309252119.jpg

    I don't know how to prove b.)

    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    attachment.php?attachmentid=36777&stc=1&d=1309252119.jpg

    What can I do after writing these 4 eqtn?
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.jpg
      1.jpg
      File size:
      42.5 KB
      Views:
      149
    • 2.jpg
      2.jpg
      File size:
      15.9 KB
      Views:
      140
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 28, 2011 #2
    You're almost there. What do you know about a linear combination of solutions to a differential equation? What does that say about each independent solution?
     
  4. Jun 28, 2011 #3
    In fact that is the hint.
    So can you also explain the hint?

    And I still don't know how to get the answer:(
     
  5. Jun 28, 2011 #4
    I'm asking it in a different way to get you to think about it. Do you know what a linear combination is? (If not then say so and I'll explain it). Have you taken a course in differential equations?

    If both elements in the linear combination are individually solutions to the differential equation then is it also true that the two elements combined in a linear combination is then a solution?
     
  6. Jun 28, 2011 #5
    Yes, I have taken courses about that and I know how to solve first and second linear differential eqtn.
    However, all I know is how to calculate. I am not fully understand the meaning behind it.

    Do you mean that I need to prove the solution for fourth eqtn is real.

    i.e. [itex]i(\psi-\psi*)[/itex] is real?
     
  7. Jun 28, 2011 #6

    ideasrule

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    A differential equation is linear if none of the terms are being squared, cubed, square rooted, etc. Schrodinger's equation is linear because the wavefunction isn't being raised to any power, and neither is its second derivative.

    For a linear system of equations (not necessarily differential equations), if you know that A and B are both solutions, all linear combinations of A and B must also be solutions. Here, you need to prove that if ψ is a solution to Schrodinger's equation, so is ψ*. Then you'll know that ψ+ψ* and i(ψ−ψ∗) are also solutions to Schrodinger's equation. But these are both real, which completes the proof.
     
  8. Jun 29, 2011 #7
    I wonder if i(ψ−ψ∗) is real, because it has a " i " in front of it.
     
  9. Jun 29, 2011 #8

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    Let [itex]\psi(x) = u(x) + i v(x)[/itex] where u(x) and v(x) are real functions. Then [itex]\psi^*(x) = u(x) - i v(x)[/itex].

    What are [itex]\psi(x)+\psi^*(x)[/itex] and [itex]i(\psi(x)-\psi^*(x))[/itex] equal to?
     
  10. Jun 29, 2011 #9
    Oh! Thanks so much!!
    Why I am so stupid that I didn't try to let [itex]\psi^*(x) = u(x) - i v(x)[/itex].:mad:
     
  11. Jun 29, 2011 #10
    Wait a minute, it is easy to solve because of the hint.
    How about without the hint? How can I get the fourth eqtn?

    Can I obtain it like this?
    By mutiplying [itex]i[/itex] on eqtn 1 and 2, implys that [itex]i\psi(x) [/itex] and [itex]i\psi(x)^* [/itex] are soln to the eqtn.

    By subtracting them get the fourth eqtn.

    Am I right?
     
  12. Jun 29, 2011 #11
    Here's my take on it:

    Given

    [tex] -\frac{{\hbar}^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}{\psi}}{dx^{2}} + V{\psi} = E{\psi} [/tex]

    Taking the complex conjugate:

    [tex] -\frac{{\hbar}^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}{\psi}^{*}}{dx^{2}} + V{\psi}^{*} = E{\psi}^{*} [/tex]

    It's important to note that both V and E are real.

    If we let [itex] {\psi}_{1} [/itex] and [itex] {\psi}_{2} [/itex] satisfy the first equation then so does some linear combination of them [itex] {\psi}_{3} [/itex] where:
    [tex] {\psi}_{3} = c_{1}{\psi}_{1} + c_{2}{\psi}_{2} [/tex]

    If we were to sub [itex] {\psi}_{3} [/itex] into the first equation we would expand out, rearrange blah blah blah simplify back down to the first equation again just with [itex] {\psi}_{3} [/itex] in place of [itex] {\psi} [/itex]

    So there we have proved that a linear combination will satisfy the equation. We also know that both [itex] {\psi} [/itex] and [itex] {\psi}^{*} [/itex] are independent solutions.

    The linear combinations:
    [tex] {\psi} + {\psi}^{*} [/tex]
    and
    [tex] i({\psi} - {\psi}^{*}) [/tex]
    are solutions and are also real.

    Thus we can conclude that from any complex solution we can construct two real solutions.

    We can write:

    [tex] {\psi} = \frac{1}{2}[({\psi} + {\psi}^{*}) -i( i({\psi} - {\psi}^{*}))] [/tex]
    which we can simplify down to just [itex] {\psi} [/itex] we have thus proven that any [itex] {\psi} [/itex] can be written as a linear combination of two real solutions.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Wave function
  1. Wave Function (Replies: 3)

  2. Wave Function (Replies: 1)

  3. Wave Function (Replies: 2)

  4. Wave function (Replies: 9)

  5. Wave function (Replies: 3)

Loading...