I have been pondering the description of matter recently, as some of you may have noticed by my recent posts in this channel.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

one of the most recent workings has been with respect to wave length and quantum units of length.

The options I have been working between are:

1) The wavelength of a particle is [tex]/bf{described}[/tex] by the gravitational field i.e. [tex]L=\int_{\gamma}d^{1}x\left|\mbox{det}e(x)\right|[/tex] which in LQG steps up to be an operator. Thus the matter wave has an intrinsic wavelength that is described by the gravitational field as an observable. This seems to say that this intrinsic length can only be measured only so well, and the actual wavelength of the particle can never be known with complete accuracy.

2) The wave length of a particle is [tex]\bf{prescribed}[/tex] by the gravitational field. That is to say, the length of the matter wave must be of a length equal to an integer number of quanta of space.

Thanks for reading.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wave length and LQG

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Wave length | Date |
---|---|

B Planck Length and Lorentz Contraction | Oct 7, 2017 |

A Erebons: Planck mass Dark Matter particles | Aug 7, 2017 |

I Signatures of extra dimensions in gravitational waves | May 19, 2017 |

I Is Gravity Dynamically Emergent From Wave Function Collapse? | May 16, 2017 |

A Is asymptotic safety linear with respect to the wavefunction | Jan 18, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**