Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

We have no resonsibility for the past?

  1. Oct 6, 2003 #1
    We have no resonsibility for the past? What do you think about this topic?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 6, 2003 #2

    drag

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Not for your own past (to an extent, since we're not
    single particles) but certainly we are responsible for
    the past of others and more and more of it(in terms of time)
    the farther they are from us.

    Live long and prosper.
     
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2003
  4. Oct 6, 2003 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Well, first, I don't know what "resonsibility" is!

    Assuming you meant "responsibility", wouldn't this be better under "General Discussion" or "Philosophy" than "General Physics"?
     
  5. Oct 6, 2003 #4

    drag

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I think s/he's talking about "being responsible" for
    the past in QM terms. :wink:
     
  6. Oct 6, 2003 #5

    Tsu

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: Re: We have no resonsibility for the past?

    By this statement, do you mean Americans today are responsible for historically enslaving blacks or taking away the land of Native Americans and forcing them to live on reservations?
     
  7. Oct 6, 2003 #6
    Re: Re: Re: We have no resonsibility for the past?

    Woah- huge leap there

    by past do you mean everything back to the beginning of time as we know it?
     
  8. Oct 6, 2003 #7

    Tsu

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: Re: Re: Re: We have no resonsibility for the past?

    Huge leap where? I guess I thought that, since this is GD forum, we wouldn't be talking about particles or QM, as previously stated. I was just wondering what drag meant by responsiblities of the "past of others and more and more of it(in terms of time)
    the farther they are from us." Those were just examples I used to try to clarify the question.
    But, I suppose I should be asking "HEY! garytse86!! What the hell do you mean 'responsibilities for the past?"
     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2003
  9. Oct 7, 2003 #8

    drag

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Greetings !
    What drag meant is to respond to a thread posted in
    the general physics forum, but someone's been "overmentoring"
    and this is the result. :wink:
    Nope, I meant that modern humans are responsible for destroying
    wild life and terminating many spieces of plants and animals
    thus presenting no responsibility and respect for the life on
    their planet and their own sources.

    Live long and prosper.
     
  10. Oct 7, 2003 #9

    Tsu

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Ah. Well, that makes a HECK of a lot more sense! And I agree wholeheartedly. We must have more respect and take more responsibility to protect our fragile ecosystems. But I fear it may just be too late.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: We have no resonsibility for the past?
  1. We Have No Choice! (Replies: 11)

  2. We have a FAWN (Replies: 44)

  3. Do we have souls? (Replies: 29)

  4. We have new neighbors! (Replies: 16)

Loading...