- #1

newton1

- 152

- 0

we know e (exponential) is a irrational number....

how can we prove it??

how can we prove it??

Last edited by a moderator:

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter newton1
- Start date

- #1

newton1

- 152

- 0

we know e (exponential) is a irrational number....

how can we prove it??

how can we prove it??

Last edited by a moderator:

- #2

One way yields an infinite series of non-repeating rational numbers. The sum is therefore irrational.

Try proving the sqrt(5) is irrational.

- #3

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 43,021

- 970

One standard method is to use the Taylor's series (which may be what emu meant): e= 1+ 1/2 + 1/6+ ...+ 1/n!+ ...

If j is any positve integer then e*j!= integer+ 1/(q+1)+ 1/(q+1)(q+2)+ ... which is not an integer so e cannot be written as a fraction with denominator j for any j.

A theorem I saw years ago was this: If c> 0, and there exist a function f(x), continuous on [0,c], positive on (0,c) and such that f(x) and its iterated anti-derivatives can be taken to be integer valued at both 0 and c, the c is irrational!

Taking f(x)= sin(x) in this theorem shows that pi is irrational.

It can also be used to prove: If c is a positive number other than 1 and ln(c) is rational, then c is irrational.

Since e is a positive number, not equal to 1, and ln(e)= 1 is rational, it follows that e is irrational.

- #4

Frac

- 3

- 0

- #5

- #6

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,967

- 19

e*j!= integer+ 1/(q+1)+ 1/(q+1)(q+2)+ ... which is not an integer

That's not obvious... I don't see why the infinite sequence there cannot add up to an integral value.

Hurkyl

- #7

bogdan

- 191

- 0

It's quite simple to prove that 1/(n+1)!<e-An<1/(n!*n);

Let's suppose e is rational, so it's equal to p/q, where p and q are integers.

1/(n+1)!<e-(1+1/2!+...+1/n!)<1/(n!*n); | *n!;

1/(n+1)<n!*p/q-n!*(1+1/2!+...+1/n!)<1/n;

But between 1/(n+1) and 1/n is no integer...

n!*p/q must be an integer because for n big enough n! is a multiple of q;

So e is not rational...

QED

- #8

- #9

newton1

- 152

- 0

thank you....:)

- #10

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,967

- 19

That bit isn't obvious either.... but the ordinary taylor remainder formula gives e/(n+1)! for that term which is sufficient for the proof. Don't tell me how to get that end of the inequality, it'd be a good exercise to figure it out myself!

Hurkyl

Share:

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 400

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 384

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 418

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 340

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 341

- Replies
- 31

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 398

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 177

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 972

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 314