Pete, the latex isn't working in the private messages, so I posted this:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Do you agree with the following mass of statements (sorry for the length), I'll number them for reference

#1)

In the weak field, g_uv = n_uv + h_uv, h_uv <<1, and we raise and lower indices with n_uv, not h_uv.

#2)

In the weak field the Christoffel symbols are

[edit] factor of 1/2 added [/end edit]

[tex]

\Gamma^c{}_{ab} = \frac{1}{2} n^{cd} (\partial_a\, g_{bd} + \partial_b\, g_{ad} - \partial_d \, g_{ab})

[/tex]

#3)

In the weak field, the Riemann is

[tex]R^a{}_{bcd} = \partial_c \, \Gamma^a{}_{bd} - \partial_d \,\Gamma^a{}_{bc} [/tex]

ps - glad you're out of surgery & hope you're doing as well as you sound.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Weak field relativity - with future applications to the moving mass discussion

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**