Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am reading the link http://math.mit.edu/~jspeck/18.152_Fall2011/Lecture notes/18152 lecture notes - 4.pdf

Says :

[tex]w_t-D w_{xx}=f [/tex] with f<0

w at [tex]\bar{Q}_T[/tex] has its maximum in [tex]\partial_p {Q}_T[/tex]. If w is strictly negative at [tex]\partial_p {Q}_T[/tex] then also is strictly negative in [tex]\bar{Q}_T[/tex]

(it is OK)

Says [tex]u=w-\epsilon t [/tex] , [tex]u \leq w [/tex], [tex]w \leq u + \epsilon T [/tex], T is cota,

then [tex]u_{t}-Du_{xx}=f-\epsilon <0 [/tex] (1)

(it is OK)

Says: Claim that the maximum of u in [tex]\bar{Q}_{T-\epsilon}[/tex] is on [tex]\partial_p {Q}_{T-\epsilon}[/tex]. To verify the claim we use [tex](t_0,x_0) \in \bar{Q}_{T-\epsilon}[/tex].

Says: [tex]t_0 \in (0,T-\epsilon][/tex] since if [tex]t=0[/tex] the claim is trueI dont understand this.

Says [tex]u_t=0[/tex] if [tex]t_0 \in (0,T-\epsilon)[/tex] (it is OK), but says [tex]u_t \geq 0[/tex] if [tex]t_0 =T-\epsilon[/tex]I dont understand this.

Then using Taylor and claims:

[tex]u_{t}-Du_{xx}>0 [/tex] (2) and says "which contradicts (1)"I dont understand this

Best regard.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Weak maximum principle

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**