- #1
ak416
- 122
- 0
This has to do with the wedge product ^ on alternating tensors. I can't seem to prove w ^ n = (-1)^kl * n ^ w. where w is a k alternating tensor and n is an l alternating tensor.
I know w ^ n = (k+l)!/(k! l!) * Alt(w x n) where x is the tensor product.
Now, Alt(wxn) (v_1,...,v_k+l) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (w x n) (v_s(1),...,v_s(k+l) )
= 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (n x w) (v_s(k+1),...,v_s(k+l),v_s(1),...,v_s(k)) )
Note Sk is the set of all permutations of the numbers 1,...,k.
Now if I let s' be the permutation such that
Alt(w x n) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (n x w) (v_s'(1),...,v_s'(k+l)) )
then shouldn't Alt(w x n) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s' in Sk) ( (-1)^m * sgn(s') * (n x w) (v_s'(1),...,v_s'(k+l)) )
where m is the number of transpositions needed to transform (k+1,...,k+l,1,...,k) to (1,...,k+l). Because if this is true then doesn't the property imply that m = l*k. And this isn't true. So what am i doing wrong here?
I know w ^ n = (k+l)!/(k! l!) * Alt(w x n) where x is the tensor product.
Now, Alt(wxn) (v_1,...,v_k+l) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (w x n) (v_s(1),...,v_s(k+l) )
= 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (n x w) (v_s(k+1),...,v_s(k+l),v_s(1),...,v_s(k)) )
Note Sk is the set of all permutations of the numbers 1,...,k.
Now if I let s' be the permutation such that
Alt(w x n) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s in Sk) ( sgn(s) * (n x w) (v_s'(1),...,v_s'(k+l)) )
then shouldn't Alt(w x n) = 1/(k+l)! * (sum over all s' in Sk) ( (-1)^m * sgn(s') * (n x w) (v_s'(1),...,v_s'(k+l)) )
where m is the number of transpositions needed to transform (k+1,...,k+l,1,...,k) to (1,...,k+l). Because if this is true then doesn't the property imply that m = l*k. And this isn't true. So what am i doing wrong here?