Weird notation

  • #1
Hi,

I'm reading an old book titled 'Mathematics of classical and quantum physics' by byron & fuller. It's quite nice, but some of the notation confuses me.

On page 388, they're showing a simple differential equation:

[tex]-i\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x)[/tex]

fine, but then they write the solution (given the initial condition y(a)=y0) as:

[tex]y(x) = y0 + i\int_a^x f(x')dx'[/tex]

These primes don't make any sense to me. What's up? Especially the one on the differential.
I would just have written the same thing without the primes.

I exspect this to be some kind of outdated notation, but it could also be that it just is something i've never seen. Can anyone tell me what's going on?

thx
Frederic
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Char. Limit
Gold Member
1,204
14
I think it's just another way to say [tex]y(x)=y(0)+i\int f(x) dx[/tex].
 
  • #3
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,393
685
That x' is just a dummy variable. The only difference between this text and a more modern one is that the more modern text will use greek letters:

[tex]y(x) = y_0 + i\int_a^x f(\xi)d\xi[/tex]
 
  • #4
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
73
The notation isn't outdated. The integral needs to be a function of x in order to make the equation make sense, and so the upper limit is x. Then, x' is a dummy variable-- this can really be anything you like (apart from x!).
 
  • #5
Thx guys, of course! I get it now. :)
 

Related Threads on Weird notation

  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
758
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
810
Top