(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); "Well-Behaved" curve

I am reviewing/browsing through Stewart'sEarly Transcendentalsand had a question about the section on Double Integrals over General Regions. It says that in order to integrate a functionfover regionsDof a general shape, we supposeDis a bounded region that can be enclosed in a rectangular regionR. Then a new functionFwith domainRis defined :

F(x,y) =f(x,y) if (x,y) is inD, and F(x,y) = 0 if (x,y) is inRbut not inD.

Then, a theorem is stated:

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA=[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA.

And then (finally, getting to my question) it says that iffis continuous on D and the boundary curve of D is "well behaved" (in a sense outside the scope of this book), then it can be shown that [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA exists and therefore [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA exists. What does it mean by well-behaved, and can someone offer an elementary explanation as to why the boundary curve of D must be well behaved in order for [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA to exist, and why that implies that [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA exists?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Well-Behaved curve

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**