What a jerk!

  • #1
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
I asked a quesion about this a while back, but I never felt that I got a perfectly straight answer.
I want to know if there is any real physical situation where there is a constant jerk (third derivative of displacement with respect to time). I am perfectly aware of how common jerk is as well as countless higher derivatives. I actually want to know if there is something as simple as a constant force causing a constant acceleration. In other words, is there any physical situation where a force increases constantly and linearly over some non infinitesimal time interval?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
If you stretch a spring at a constant rate (dx/dt= constant), the force, F= kx, increases linearly at a constant rate.
 
  • #3
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
well, that's not what I mean, I don't mean linearly with the variable of displacement, I mean time.
 
  • #4
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
oh,I see
sorry
 
  • #5
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
but that does not work, I need net force.
in other words, I only care whether or not a constant jerk can exist.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
I actually want to know if there is something as simple as a constant force causing a constant acceleration. In other words, is there any physical situation where a force increases constantly and linearly over some non infinitesimal time interval?

Your "in other words" is a complete rewording of what came before it! On the one hand, you want to know about constant forces, and on the other hand you want to know about constantly increasing forces. Which is it? :confused: No matter, both can be addressed. But do keep in mind that they are different!

An instance of a constant force causing a constant acceleration happens whenever a constant force acts on a particle. In that case, Newton's 2nd law says that [itex]\vec{F}=m\vec{a}[/itex]. In words that implies that the force is proportional to the acceleration. When one is constant, so is the other.

The example of Hooke's law provided above gives you an example of the second thing you asked for, which once again is not the same as the first.
 
  • #7
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
edit: deleting this...
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
hold on
1) what is this second and what is this first, I didnt mean to ask anything about constant forces.
2) I did not mean that I just want an example of constantly changing force--I want an example of constantly changing net force. The hooke's law example does not do that.

do you see what I am saying?
 
  • #9
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23
well, that's not what I mean, I don't mean linearly with the variable of displacement, I mean time.

If you mean linearly with respect to time, then this can be rigged up with an appropriate machine. As a first approximation, consider a mass on a frictionless surface. Let a cord be attached to the mass and drawn over a pulley. Let the other end of the pulley be attached to a pan, into which flows a steady stream of water. The weight in the pan (and therefore, the horizontal force on the car) will grow linearly in time.
 
  • #10
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
hehe, I like that example thanks.
it is rigged, but it's cool.
thanks.
 
  • #11
Ja4Coltrane
225
0
interesting, thanks for your help.
 

Suggested for: What a jerk!

  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
20K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
684
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
804
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
406
Replies
4
Views
487
Replies
36
Views
2K
Top