- #1

- 14

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter HussanAli
- Start date

- #1

- 14

- 0

- #2

LowlyPion

Homework Helper

- 3,097

- 6

The issue is more in the expression of the length than in the meter stick you are using. While the finest scale may be 1 meter in your example, the observer may reasonably estimate to say 1/4 of that and your uncertainty could be expressed as ± 1/4 if more % precision is useful.

On the other hand if you have a measure that is 1000 m long, and it is only marked, in 1 m increments, then a ± 1 m may be satisfactory precision for the kinds of measurements you would be making.

In other words, I think some common sense needs to used in actual practice.

- #3

minger

Science Advisor

- 1,496

- 2

For example, let's say that I need to divide 2.3069 by 4. (side note, integers are always assumed to have "infinite" significant digits, you'll understand more here in a second). Anyways, the answer is 0.576725. However, with significant digits, we say that due to the precision of what came in, the answer can only be 0.5767. Basically, how can we get more precision than what we started with.

Share: