What are the pros and cons of using glass or metallic dewars/cryostats?

  • Thread starter swooshfactory
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Glass
In summary: Your name]In summary, when considering using LHe containers for experiments, it is important to take into account the price, longevity, and necessary associated equipment. LHe is relatively expensive, so the cost of the container and equipment must be considered. Metallic cryostats may be a more cost-effective option and can maintain LHe for longer periods of time compared to glass dewars. The necessary equipment for LHe experiments may include a vacuum pump, temperature controllers, and pressure gauges. When looking into metallic cryostats, some popular options include the Oxford Instruments Optistat and the Janis Research Company cryostats.
  • #1
swooshfactory
63
0
My question is specifically with respect to holding LHe and using these containers as the environment for experiments (so not just for storage):

Features to consider:

Price
Longevity
Necessary associated equipment (I know this could be vague, but the LHe glass dewar would be surrounded by an LN2 dewar + equipment to pump on the LHe dewar. I'm not sure what is necessary with a metallic cryostat)


I am trying to learn about metallic cryostats/cryogenics, so any information could be valuable. Linked examples would also really be appreciated!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for your question about using LHe containers for experiments. As a scientist who has worked with cryogenics and metallic cryostats, I can provide some insight on the features to consider when using LHe for experiments.

Price is an important factor to consider when using LHe containers for experiments. LHe is a relatively expensive cryogen, so it's important to consider the cost of both the LHe container and the associated equipment needed for the experiments. In some cases, using a metallic cryostat may be more cost-effective than using an LHe glass dewar, as the metallic cryostat can be reused multiple times.

Longevity is another important factor to consider. LHe has a low boiling point and can evaporate quickly, so it's important to choose a container that can maintain the LHe at the desired temperature for the duration of the experiment. Metallic cryostats are typically more durable and can maintain the LHe for longer periods of time compared to glass dewars.

When using LHe containers for experiments, it's also important to consider the necessary associated equipment. This could include a vacuum pump, temperature controllers, and pressure gauges. The specific equipment needed may vary depending on the experiment and the type of container being used. It's important to carefully evaluate the necessary equipment and ensure it is properly set up and maintained for the experiment.

In terms of metallic cryostats, there are a variety of options available on the market. Some popular examples include the Oxford Instruments Optistat and the Janis Research Company cryostats. These cryostats have different features and capabilities, so it's important to research and compare them to determine which one best fits your experimental needs.

I hope this information is helpful in your understanding of metallic cryostats and LHe containers for experiments. Best of luck in your research!
 

1. What are the advantages of using a glass dewar/cryostat?

One major advantage of using a glass dewar/cryostat is its transparency, which allows for easy monitoring of the contents inside. Glass also has a lower thermal conductivity compared to metals, making it a better insulator for cryogenic temperatures. Additionally, glass is less prone to corrosion and chemical reactions, making it suitable for storing sensitive samples or materials.

2. What are the disadvantages of using a glass dewar/cryostat?

One drawback of using a glass dewar/cryostat is its fragility. Glass can easily break or shatter, especially at extremely low temperatures. This can lead to potential safety hazards and loss of valuable samples. Glass also has a lower strength compared to metals, making it unsuitable for high pressure applications.

3. What are the benefits of using a metallic dewar/cryostat?

Metallic dewars/cryostats have a higher thermal conductivity, which allows for faster cooling and better temperature control. They are also more durable and can withstand higher pressures, making them suitable for a wider range of applications. In addition, metals are easier to shape and mold, allowing for more complex designs and sizes.

4. What are the limitations of using a metallic dewar/cryostat?

One limitation of using a metallic dewar/cryostat is its opacity, which makes it difficult to monitor the contents inside without opening the lid. This can lead to potential sample contamination or loss. Metals are also more prone to corrosion and chemical reactions, which may affect the integrity of stored materials.

5. Which type of dewar/cryostat is more cost-effective?

The cost-effectiveness of using a glass or metallic dewar/cryostat depends on the specific needs and applications. Glass dewars/cryostats may be more expensive to purchase, but they are more durable and have a longer lifespan. Metallic dewars/cryostats may be cheaper upfront, but they may require more frequent maintenance and replacement. Ultimately, the most cost-effective option will vary depending on the specific circumstances and intended use.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
10
Views
8K
Back
Top