Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News What bush said to martin

  1. Jan 23, 2005 #1
    http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/050123/w012336.html [Broken]

    more ammo for the anti-bush forces in canada (& maybe elsewhere) i guess....
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 23, 2005 #2
    I think that would be great. Canadians are so superiror to Americans, they could easily defend themselves, along with all the other countires that the US protects. I personally think that the US should not waste any money protecting other countries, especially with all this talk about how the US is in debt.

    Good to see that Canada will sign on, and that Bush's threat may have worked.
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2005
  4. Jan 24, 2005 #3
    you americans always seem to think you "defend" others but from whom? who is going to attack canada? (if not the US itself)
  5. Jan 24, 2005 #4
    Just because the odds of Canada getting attacked is slim, does not mean that protecting it is a bad idea. And it seems as though your Prime Minister would agree.
  6. Jan 24, 2005 #5
    god, America has been getting more and more staunchy with it's claims, when did this "America protecting Canada" rhetoric start? You're not protecting anyone, NORAD was set up during the cold war to protect America AND Canada from the possibility against Russian Bombers and Missiles, you barely have any military bases in Canada, mainly radar stations and it would be a small step for Canada to be able to defend it's self against anyone who does want to invade them and has the naval logistics capability to do so.

    So don't start thinking your doing us any favors, there are a good number of people in Canada who want NORAD disbanded and the Americans kicked out, especially after Iraq. What nerve.
  7. Jan 24, 2005 #6
    In fact, last I heard you guys were trying to bully us into expanding NORAD into a missile defence system, allying with you is making us even more vulernable than if we hadn't signed on NORAD in the first place.
  8. Jan 24, 2005 #7
    bloody hate you stupid neocons [/rant]
  9. Jan 24, 2005 #8
    neocons? Are you reffering to your PM or some Canadian official? I thought your PM was a liberal. Personally, and this is coming from an someone who lives in the US, I do not think we are protecting Canada. And if we are, I think we should stop. Why waste money on Canadians when we need it here.

    Also, this is the first time I had ever heard of the US protecting Canada.
  10. Jan 24, 2005 #9
    neocons being the term refering to ultra right-wing hawkish politicians usually involved in some way with PNAC such as bush, wolfowitz, cheney, ect.

    and our PM is indeed a member of the Liberal party, wether or not they're 'liberal' is open to debate. In comparison to the US our Conservatives are 'liberal' but in comparison to Europe our "socialists" (NDP Party) are conservative
  11. Jan 25, 2005 #10


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Are you guys talking about that missile defense system which doesn't even leave the silo during a test ?
    Read the ironic news reports on "what's new" from the university of Maryland :smile:

  12. Jan 25, 2005 #11
    *chuckle chuckle*
  13. Jan 25, 2005 #12
    I'm not much for conspiracy theory, but this is an interesting statement:
    "They say they may never publicly declare when the shield is fully ready."

    I've often wondered if certain programs, like the ABMS, are already complete, and this all a front.
  14. Jan 25, 2005 #13
    Building missile defence will certainly boost the economy in the defence sector! Net flow of $ : Canada -> US.

    Gruman stocks anyone?

    Oh that's right, freedom is what Bush is concerned about, sorry about that.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook