What consequenses would there be if the photon got mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Photon
Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi, as I understand the photon can according to todays theory have a very small mass. What would this actually mean if it shows up to be true?
I now the we had to give the neutrinos mass to solve the solar neutrino puzzel, but since I don't got so much mathematical knowledge, I can't deduce it on my own.

Are there some interesting things that would happen or be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The photon has zero mass in every extant theory (QM, general relativity, string theories). Any attempt to prove this by measurement will have some experimental error. The best any experiment can do is establish some non-zero upper bound on the photon's mass. This upper bound is incredibly small and getting smaller as experiments improve.

Don't mistake a reported non-zero upper bound on the photon's mass as meaning the photon does have non-zero mass. No experiment to assess the photon's mass has shown a non-zero lower bound on the photon's mass. All measurements to date are consistent with the theoretical mass of zero.
 
**IF** the photon had mass (m), it would imply some rather remarkable things. Here are a few of them:

(1) It would break the gauge symmetry of E&M. This means that charge would no longer be conserved - you would be able to create or destroy charge.

(2) It would imply that the Coulomb force would no longer be infinite range, but would have a "Yukawa" potential:

V\sim\frac{e^{-mr}}{r}

(3) It would change the dispersion relation k=\omega/c, leading to violations of the laws of optics (law of reflection/refraction, etc); similarly, it would imply that light waves can be longitudinally polarized, rather than only transversely polarized.

(4) It would wreak havoc with our notions of causality, since signals would be able to travel "faster than light".

There are just a few consequences.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top