What does it mean by an equation of state is a particle?

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
There was a recently posted thread titled "What does it mean by a particle is a "wave"?

I think it might be more appropriate to ask, what does it mean by an equation of state is a particle?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Phrak said:
I think it is might be more appropriate to ask, what does it mean by an equation of state is a particle?
That question is a) syntactically incorrect; and b) ignoring 'a,' it still doesn't make any sense.
 
zhermes said:
That question is a) syntactically incorrect; and b) ignoring 'a,' it still doesn't make any sense.

Fixed it. I'm using the syntax of the previous title.
 
This is a very strange exchange, but I am guessing that Phrak is referrring to the Schrodinger equation which could be called an equation of state of the variable \Psi which is a potential function and can be interpreted as a particle.
 
Studiot said:
This is a very strange exchange,
agreed.

Studiot said:
the Schrodinger equation which could be called an equation of state of the variable \Psi
Interesting; I'm only familiar with the term equation of state referring to density-pressure relations (etc) esp. in stars and other astronomical bodies. Why is the term used here as-well?
 
The differentials of state functions are exact so you can integrate an equation of state containing them.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top