Is Centrifugal Force Real or a Pseudo Force?

In summary: This force is known as a pseudo force because it is not an actual force, but rather a fictitious force that arises when we observe the motion of objects from a non-inertial reference frame, such as a rotating frame. In summary, the centrifugal force is a pseudo force that appears in a non-inertial reference frame and is equal and opposite to the acceleration caused by the centripetal force. Its existence is still debated among scientists, with some considering it to be a real force and others viewing it as an artifact of observation from a non-inertial frame.
  • #1
nomorevishnu
34
0
What is a centrifugal force? Is it a pseudo force?

Does it really exist?.. Maybe i am not getting the idea of what a pseudo force is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
nomorevishnu said:
What is a centrifugal force?
The centrifugal force is an outward-directed inertial force exerted on a body when it moves azimuthally in a noninertial rotating reference frame.
Is it a pseudo force?
Some scientists use that term to refer to inertial forces. However this is not universally used since some scientists consider inertial forces to be real (whatever that means).
Does it really exist?
Can't say unless you first tell us what you mean by "real"? As Ray D'Inverno wrote in his GR text The status of inertial forces is again a controversial one. In my opinion is is quite real. A good example is the following

http://www.whoi.edu/science/PO/people/jprice/class/aCt.pdf

For other examples of physicists with the same opinion consider the following:

From Newtonian Mechanics, A.P. French, The M.I.T. Introductory Physics Series, W.W. Norton Pub. , (1971) , page 499. After describing the inertial force as seen from an accelerating frame of reference French writes
From the standpoint of an observer in the accelerating frame, the inertial force is actually present. If one took steps to keep an object "at rest" in S', by tying it down with springs, these springs would be observed to elongate or contract in such a way as to provide a counteracting force to balance the inertial force. To describe such force as "fictitious" is therefore somewhat misleading. One would like to have some convenient label that distinguishes inertial forces from forces that arise from true physical interactions, and the term "psuedo-force" is often used. Even this, however, does not do justice to such forces experienced by someone who is actually in the accelerating frame of reference. Probably the original, strictly technical name, "inertial force," which is free of any questionable overtones, remains the best description.
From The Variational Principles of Mechanics - 4th Ed., Cornelius Lanczos, Dover Pub., page 98.
Whenever the motion of the reference system generates a force which has to be added to the relative force of inertia I’, measured in that system, we call that force an “apparent force.” The name is well chosen, inasmuch as that force does not exist in the absolute system. The name is misleading, however, if it is interpreted as a force which is not as “real” as any given physical force. In the moving reference system the apparent force is a perfectly real force, which is not distinguishable in its nature from any other impressed force. Let us suppose that the observer is not aware of the fact that his reference system is in accelerated motion. Then purely mechanical observations cannot reveal to him that fact.
From Cosmological Physics, John A. Peacock, Cambridge University Press, (1999), page 6-7
The 'weak equivalence principle' is a statement only about space and time. It says that in any gravitational field, however strong, a freely falling observer will experience no gravitational effects - with the important exception of tidal force in non-uniform fields. [...] It may seem that we have actually returned to something like the Newtonian viewpoint: gravitation is merely an artifact of looking at things from the 'wrong' point of view. This is really not so; rather, the important aspects of gravitation are not so much first order effects as second order tidal forces: They cannot be transformed away and are the true signature of gravitating mass. However, it is certainly true in one sense to say that gravity is not a 'real' force, the gravitational acceleration is not derived from a 4-force and transforms differently.
.. Maybe i am not getting the idea of what a pseudo force is...
Does this help?

Pete
 
  • #3
  • #4
I sometimes find it helpful to think first about the inertial force we've all experienced in an accelerating vehicle. We're certainly pushed back into the seat (or thrown forward under deceleration), so the force feels "real" enough. What is missing, however, is any kind of field that exerts this force, much less a source for such a field. This distinguishes such forces from ones like electrical or magnetic forces (or gravitational forces, at least when understood as Newton did), where there are fields with sources.

The Equivalence Principle definitely makes the question more interesting, and I can't say that I've ever really felt I had a complete handle on it. I'm incapable of riding a subway without wondering how the forces I feel as I get jerked around are somehow equivalent to gravitational forces.
 
  • #5
nomorevishnu said:
What is a centrifugal force? Is it a pseudo force?

Does it really exist?.. Maybe i am not getting the idea of what a pseudo force is...

it's a pseudoforce that appears in an accelerated frame of reference that, within that frame of reference of curved or circular motion, appears to pull objects away from the center of rotation.

the real force is the centripetal force that is pushing the objects in circular motion toward the center of rotation. so, if you're in a car going around a bend in the road, it's not that you're being pulled outward and pressing against the car door (despite what you think you feel) but that the car door is pushing you in the direction you are being accelerated (which, in circular motion, is toward the center of rotation).
 
  • #6
Centripetal force is the force that accelerates a moving body "inwards", and centrifual force is the equal and opposite reaction force to the acceleration caused by the centripital force.
 

What is a centrifugal force?

A centrifugal force is a fictitious force that appears to act outward on an object that is undergoing circular motion. It is not a real force, but rather a result of the inertia of the object trying to maintain its straight-line motion.

How does a centrifugal force differ from a centripetal force?

A centrifugal force and a centripetal force are two sides of the same coin. A centripetal force is a real force that acts towards the center of rotation, while a centrifugal force is an apparent force that acts away from the center of rotation. They are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

What causes a centrifugal force to arise?

A centrifugal force arises due to the tendency of an object to maintain its straight-line motion. In circular motion, the object is constantly changing direction, and the centrifugal force appears to act outward to counteract this change in direction.

Can a centrifugal force do work?

No, a centrifugal force cannot do work. Since it is a fictitious force, it does not transfer energy to or from an object. Only real forces, such as gravity or friction, can do work on an object.

How is a centrifugal force related to the concept of inertia?

A centrifugal force is related to the concept of inertia as it is a result of an object's inertia to maintain its straight-line motion. The greater the inertia of an object, the stronger the centrifugal force will be. This is why larger and heavier objects experience a stronger centrifugal force than smaller and lighter objects.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
969
  • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
664
Replies
78
Views
5K
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
975
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top