1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is a rotating frame

  1. Jul 24, 2014 #1

    Often in physics we need to consider frames of reference that are non-inertial (the Earth spinning on its axis for example). We must therefore see how these rotating reference frames relate to an inertial reference frame.


    [tex]\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{dt^2} = \ddot{\mathbf{r}} + 2(\mathbf{\Omega} \times \dot{\mathbf{r}}) +\mathbf{\Omega} \times (\mathbf{\Omega} \times \mathbf{r})[/tex]

    Extended explanation

    Effect on 1st derivatives:

    Consider a rotating frame with an instantaneous angular velocity [itex]\mathbf{\Omega}[/itex]. A unit vector [itex]\mathbf{e}_i[/itex] traces a circle about [itex]\mathbf{\Omega}[/itex] at a rate:

    [tex]\frac{d\mathbf{e}_i}{dt} = \mathbf{\Omega} \times \mathbf{e}_i [/tex]

    A particle will have a position in the rotating frame given by [itex]\mathbf{r} = x_i\mathbf{e}_i[/itex] (where [itex]i[/itex] is summed from 1 to 3) and thus the velocity in an inertial frame is then:

    [tex] \frac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}( x_i\mathbf{e}_i) = \frac{dx_i}{dt}\mathbf{e}_i + x_i\frac{d\mathbf{e}_i}{dt} = \frac{dx_i}{dt}\mathbf{e}_i + x_i(\mathbf{\Omega} \times \mathbf{e}_i)[/tex]

    Example: torque equation:

    For example, in a fixed frame of reference, the equation relating net torque on a body to its rate of change of angular momentum is:

    [tex]\mathbf{\tau}_{net}\ =\ \frac{d}{dt}\left(\tilde{I}\,\mathbf{\Omega}\right)\ =\ \tilde{I}\,\frac{d}{dt}\left(\mathbf{\Omega}\right)\ +\ \frac{d\tilde{I}}{dt}\left(\mathbf{\Omega}\right)[/tex]

    but in a frame rotating with the body, it is:

    [tex]\mathbf{\tau}_{net}\ =\ \frac{d}{dt}\left(\tilde{I}\,\mathbf{\Omega}\right)\ \ +\ \ \mathbf{\Omega}\,\times \left(\tilde{I}\,\mathbf{\Omega}\right)\ =\ \tilde{I}\,\frac{d}{dt}\left(\mathbf{\Omega}\right)\ \ +\ \ \mathbf{\Omega}\,\times \left(\tilde{I}\,\mathbf{\Omega}\right)[/tex]

    Effect on 2nd derivatives:

    The acceleration is then (assuming [itex]\mathbf{\Omega}[/itex] is constant):

    [tex] \frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{dt^2} = \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}+ 2\frac{dx_i}{dt}(\mathbf{\Omega}\times\mathbf{e}_i) + x_i(\mathbf{\Omega}\times(\mathbf{\Omega}\times \mathbf{e}_i))[/tex]

    Tidying up a bit we have:

    [tex]\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{dt^2} = \ddot{\mathbf{r}} + 2(\mathbf{\Omega} \times \dot{\mathbf{r}}) +\mathbf{\Omega} \times (\mathbf{\Omega} \times \mathbf{r})[/tex]

    The [itex] 2(\mathbf{\Omega} \times \dot{\mathbf{r}}) [/itex] term is called the Coriolis acceleration and the [itex]\mathbf{\Omega} \times (\mathbf{\Omega} \times \mathbf{r})[/itex] term is called the centripetal acceleration.

    What we have essentially is:

    Acceleration seen by inertial observer = Acceleration seen by rotating observer + extra terms

    * This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted