the idea is this, for the mathematician what is exactly the definition of a Trace ??(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

for example let us suppose that i find a trace operator for Riemann Zeros, then would it mean that i have solved Riemann Hypothesis ??

In the paper: http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/lectures/connes/zeta2.pdf

they say 'if the Trace xxx is correct then RH is proved'

but in order to prove a Trace is correct you only would need to test it with several functions, wouldn't you

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is exactly a Trace ?

Loading...

Similar Threads - exactly Trace | Date |
---|---|

A Second derivative of a complex matrix | Jan 6, 2018 |

I Prove the sequence is exact: 0 → ker(f) → V → im(f) → 0 | Dec 4, 2016 |

I Trouble with exact sequence | Sep 15, 2016 |

I Split Exact Sequences ... Bland, Proposition 3.2.7 | Aug 6, 2016 |

What exactly are matrices and determinants? | Sep 22, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**