Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is speed?

  1. Oct 25, 2006 #1
    Hi, new at Physics so go easy.
    My question is:
    A roller coaster is traveling on a horizontal track at 20 m/s. What is its speed after climbing a hill 15m high? Ignore friction.

    any help will be great.
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 25, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Use the fact that the work done to lift a mass on a height h, equals the change of kinetic energy of that mass.
  4. Oct 25, 2006 #3
    so it should be 1/2mv2 = 1/2mv1 - mgh
    1/2v2 = 1/v1 - gh
    v = square root of v1 - 2gh ?
    Yes or No?
  5. Oct 25, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    No, since this is the square root of a negative number. The work done is mgh, and the change of kinetic energy is 1/2 m(v2)^2 - 1/2 m(v1)^2, where v2 is the speed at the height of 15m, and v1 the initial speed. So, this implies 2gh + (v1)^2 = (v2)^2.
  6. Oct 25, 2006 #5
    so it come up to v2 = 26.34 m/s

    how is going faster going up the hill then what it started out?
  7. Oct 25, 2006 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I apologize - I overlooked something. The work mgh must be negative. :smile:
  8. Oct 25, 2006 #7
    Its easier to think of this as consevation of energy-it initially has an energy of 1/2 mv^2, pure KE. Then it gains PE but for conservation to hold, it must lose KE


    but PE1=0 because its at the base height of theis scenario.



    the mass cacels

    solve for v2
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2006
  9. Oct 25, 2006 #8


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Of course, it is clear what you wanted to say, but your equation 1/2mv^2=1/2mv^2+mgh implies 0 = mgh, and there is no 'v2' in it. :biggrin: So, be just a bit more precise when writing something.

    Further on, it is not easier to think about this as conservation of energy, it's just another point of view.
  10. Oct 25, 2006 #9
    I think conservation of energy


    Clearly indicated that there were 2 KE's and therefore 2 velocities. And try not to tell people to be a bit more precise after you have just made a much more careless error. Mine was technical, yours was a mistake.

    Furthermore, in introductory physics these concepts are developed through the conservation of energy law-always. I think that any physics teacher would agree that its necessary to understand the laws before trying to link work and PE.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the particular chapter he is currently in was titled, "Conservation of Energy"
  11. Oct 25, 2006 #10
    this is true it chp 4 4.7 Conservation of energy

    so PE2 should be negative due to gravity

    so KE1 = KE2 - PE2
  12. Oct 25, 2006 #11
    Think about it this way, the initial energy must be equal to the final energy becasue energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form. This is whats happening here, initially it has KE but no PE (PE is relevent to some reference point, we are choosing the initial reference point to be 0 for simplicity).

    Now since it has gone up 15m from the reference 0 it has gianed PE, but where did this PE come from? It cannot be created so it must have come from a change, some of the KE transformed to PE.

    Therefore the sum of energy to begin with must equal the sum of energy at the end.

    the initial energy

    PE+KE1, but at the begining you have no PE to the reference because we have chosen 0 to be the reference (0-0=0)

    so the initial energy becomes


    and that must be equal to the final energy which is:


    so mathamaically it will look like this


    solve for V in the KE2 term

    thats your anwser
  13. Oct 25, 2006 #12

    PE is only negative when something goes down from the reference point. It lhas lost PE.
  14. Oct 25, 2006 #13
    so when I plug in the number I come up with a speed greater then What you started with. Started with 20 and after the math its 26 how is this
  15. Oct 26, 2006 #14
    you made an algebraic mistake

    =10.28 m/s

    My guess is that you are STILL using


    it should be


    you must be subtracting the 400 (the 20^2 term)

    In which case you end up with a negative number (-694), should be a hint that you have made a mistake because you cannot take the sqrt of a negative number w/o complex numbers. Your algebra MUST be solid before you can tackle physics, no matter how many calculus/physics/engineering classes you ever take, you will find the without solid algebra, you will always struggle.

    Everyone makes mistakes, its recognizing them that makes the difference, often the math will tell you that you need to go back and check something like in this case.

    Hope this helps
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook