Two very interesting new papers on arXiv last night by Lev Vaidman and friends lead me to ask about the differences between Cramer's transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TIQM) and the two state vector formalism (TSVF) advanced by Aharonov, Vaidman and others. At a first look, they both seem very similar to me.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The two papers:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7474 “The past of a quantum particle”, and

http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7469 “Asking a particle where it has been”.

From these two papers, you can find further references for TSVF, including its origin.

For TIQM, you can start with Wikipedia, and also trace back to the origin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What is the difference between Cramer and Vaidman?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - difference between Cramer | Date |
---|---|

I What is the difference between cfd and realism? | Dec 23, 2017 |

I Difference between field and wave equation | Jun 25, 2017 |

B What’s the difference between TIQM and Time Symmetric QM? (a | Mar 15, 2017 |

I Difference between statistical and dynamical properties | Feb 25, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**