- #1

PhysicsRock

- 117

- 18

- TL;DR Summary
- See title

In a homework problem, I had to derive the relationship ##R_{\mu\nu} = \pm K g_{\mu\nu}## on a surface, i.e. a ##2##-dimensional submanifold of ##\mathbb{R}^3##. Here, ##K## is the Gaussian curvature. I think I managed to do that, but from my derivation I don't see why this result is restricted to the mentioned special case. I believe it has to do with the fact that I used Gaussian curvature explicitly, not sectional curvature as one would in the general case. However, I don't really understand the difference between the two. I can imagine that Gaussian curvature is a global property, which would allow for us to say that ##R_{\mu\nu} = K g_{\mu\nu}## is true everywhere on a such a manifold, whereas in the general case this might not be true in every chart, we still might find some where this holds.

Thank you in advance for any help.

A quick disclaimer at the end. Although this question arose from a homework problem, it's about my understanding in general and not about said problem specifically. Therefore, I thought it would be asked here best, not in the homework forums.

Thank you in advance for any help.

A quick disclaimer at the end. Although this question arose from a homework problem, it's about my understanding in general and not about said problem specifically. Therefore, I thought it would be asked here best, not in the homework forums.