- #1

- 1,997

- 5

## Main Question or Discussion Point

What is the hypervolume of a hypercube in a Minkowski space?

- Thread starter MeJennifer
- Start date

- #1

- 1,997

- 5

What is the hypervolume of a hypercube in a Minkowski space?

- #2

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,916

- 18

4-Volume = Duration * Length * Width * Height.

- #3

- 1,997

- 5

I understand that that is the case for a Euclidean space.4-Volume = Duration * Length * Width * Height.

But I fail to understand how you conclude that that also is the case for Minkowski space.

- #4

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,916

- 18

4-volume is the integral of a 4-form, so it must be given by

[tex]V = \iiiint f(t, x, y, z) \, dt \, dx \, dy \, dz[/tex]

The symmetry of Minkowski space would force f(t, x, y, z) to be a constant function. All that's left is to determine the constant.

It would be reasonable enough to declare by fiat that the constant is 1, but a short google search turns up that there is a canonical choice of volume form, by setting*f* to be [itex]\sqrt{\left| \det g \right|}[/itex], where *g* is the metric tensor. Since we (presumably) chose (t, x, y, z)-coordinates to be orthonormal (a.k.a. an inertial coordinate chart), det g = -1, and f(t, x, y, z) = 1.

(p.s. wow, LaTeX does have a quadruple integral symbol! I would have expected it to stop at 3)

[tex]V = \iiiint f(t, x, y, z) \, dt \, dx \, dy \, dz[/tex]

The symmetry of Minkowski space would force f(t, x, y, z) to be a constant function. All that's left is to determine the constant.

It would be reasonable enough to declare by fiat that the constant is 1, but a short google search turns up that there is a canonical choice of volume form, by setting

(p.s. wow, LaTeX does have a quadruple integral symbol! I would have expected it to stop at 3)

Last edited:

- #5

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,773

- 8

- #6

- 5,489

- 719

But I think Hurkyl's response is correct.

- #7

- 1,997

- 5

These questions seem so basic, surely I am not the first person who asks such questions.

Anybody who can provide some numbers?

- #8

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,916

- 18

To be honest, I really dislike the notion of a tensor density. I much prefer thinking about the differential 4-form

But I think Hurkyl's response is correct.

f(t, x, y, z) dt dx dy dz

which is an honest-to-goodness tensor, rather than treating f(t, x, y, z) as a geometric entity in its own right.Just to make sure we're on the same page -- the unit 4-sphere is

These questions seem so basic, surely I am not the first person who asks such questions.

Anybody who can provide some numbers?

The 4-volume of the unit ball is a straightforward quadruple integral. It's the same calculation as for the 4-sphere in Euclidean 4-space.

It's far too late for me to go searching for what the right notion of 3-volume would be.

- #9

- 1,997

- 5

Well Hurkyl you seem to be much better in visualizing what a sphere is in Minkowski space, I already have enough trouble visualizing Euclidean 4-space let alone being able to visualize a sphere in Minkowski space, but whatever you want to call it, that is what I am asking for.Just to make sure we're on the same page -- the unit 4-sphere isnotthe set of all points a unit (Minkowski) distance away from the origin. That object is... well, in Minkowski 2-space it would be a hyperbola. I'm not sure what it's called in Minkowski 4-space.

So all that I am asking for is the volume of the set of all points a unit distance away from the origin and the 4-volume of the set of all points from the origin up to a unit distance away from the origin.

So I am looking for two numbers, anybody who can tell me what they are?

Last edited:

- #10

quasar987

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 4,773

- 8

[tex]\iiiint_{\mathcal{D}}dxdydzdt[/tex]

where

[tex]\mathcal{D}=\{(x,y,z,t)\in\mathcal{R}^4:-t^2+x^2+y^2+z^2\leq 1\}=\{(x,y,z,t)\in\mathcal{R}^4:x^2+y^2+z^2\leq 1+t^2\}[/tex]

So given a t, we integrate the volume of the 2-sphere of radius 1+t². And t goes from -infinity to +infinity.

- #11

- 1,997

- 5

I think you are right.I don't think the unit sphere has a finite volume.

- #12

- 5,489

- 719

In n+1 Minkowski space, the analogous hypersurface is called the hyperboloid (asymptotic to the light cone).