What is the justification for the substitution p_x -> (h/i)d/dx in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gn0m0n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physical
gn0m0n
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am wondering what justifies the substitution p_x -> (h/i)d/dx ? I know it is very common but I have not seen a reason for it anywhere. Why does it make physical sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a plane wave, that is \psi(x) = e^{i k x}, \frac{1}{i} d/dx extracts the wave vector or wavenumber kof the wave. From there we use de Broglie's relation to get the \hbar.
 
There's rather a good mathematical reason. The quantum Lagrangian is invariant under spatial translations, which guarantees momentum conservation. As Dirac shows, d/dx is the generator of translations ( page 100 'Princples..'). Dirac calls translation 'displacement' and demonstrates that the action of the operator is to return the momentum.

Clever fellow, that Dirac.
 
Thanks once again, all.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top