What is the name of the physics law

  • Thread starter OSalcido
  • Start date
66
0
that says complex things tend to breakdown into simpler things over time?
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,949
532
Chaotical systems (the eqns of motion are nonlinear) could exhibit interesting behavior.I'm sure that the evolution of nonequilibrium statistical systems follows the second principle of thermodynamics.

And your question is awfully vague.

Daniel.
 
66
0
well I cant really remember much more about the law than what I asked, sorry

I think creationists use it to disprove evolution
 
238
0
Do you mean entropy?

I think creationists use it to disprove evolution
Yeah. :uhh:
 
Last edited:

Claude Bile

Science Advisor
1,471
19
I think he is referring to the second law of thermodynamics. Whether this law says that complex things tend to break down into simpler things over time is largely debatable.

Maybe this susceptibility to misinterpretation is why creationists use it to disprove evolution?
 
10
1
Sounds like the second law of thermodynamics to me too. To properly understand the second law one must be careful and rigorous--there's a LOT of misinformation out there. Pretty much all of statistical mechanics (a formal statistical framework from which the original "laws of thermodynamics" can be derived) is based around one postulate: A system in equilibrium has equal probability of existing in any of it's accessible states.
(I am however still not too clear on the precise definition of equilibrium myself)

Here's a little example to help you understand more about entropy and "complex things" becoming "simpler". First of all, you must understand that in (classical) physics the universe is a fundamentally reversible, deterministic system in which "information" is conserved. It is only when one invokes statistics that one can talk about "losing" or "gaining" information, and I think that's what you are getting at when you ask about complex systems becoming simpler.

Imagine two chambers, connected by a tube with a valve in it. Say you close the valve and fill only the left chamber with gas. What do you know? Well, you know for instance that every particle of gas is in the left side of your system. Now say you open the valve. Equilibrium is eventually reached in which both chambers are filled with the same amount of gas. At this point, what do you know? Pretty much nothing! You really can't say what particle is where, can you? In this sense, one could say that information has been lost. Which would make it seem like the system is now "simpler".

But again, you must realize that you are still talking in terms of probabilities, which are not fundamental, but rather an abstraction used to study macroscopic systems. At the heart of everything is Newton's laws, and actually, no information has been lost.
 
167
0
Yep I think its the 2nd law of thermodynamics
 

Gokul43201

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,987
14
OSalcido said:
I think creationists use it to disprove evolution
Hah ! That's priceless...are creationists trying to use science to invalidate a scientific theory and replace it with an unscientific one ? :rolleyes:

1. As Dexter mentioned, the Second Law does not apply to non-equilibrium systems like complex organisms,

2. Even if it did (in some fantasy world), this is still a blatant misunderstanding (assuming there was even an attempt at understanding, in the first place) of the Second Law, which does NOT prohibit local reduction of entropy.

Might as well go about denying the existence of snowflakes, while they're at it ! :grumpy:
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: What is the name of the physics law

  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
768

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top